2010
DOI: 10.1080/00223981003648336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship Between Charismatic Leadership, Work Engagement, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors

Abstract: Researchers in organizational behavior have long been interested in exploring how employees' perceptions of their leaders influence their work-related thoughts and behaviors. This study tested a meditation model linking leader charisma to organizational citizenship behaviors (OCB) via work engagement. The authors administered 91 participants the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire, the OCB Scale, and the Work Engagement Scale. The results indicated a significant positive relation between charismatic leadershi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

28
218
1
8

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 335 publications
(255 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
28
218
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have, for example, demonstrated that transformational leadership (Tims, Bakker andXanthopoulou, 2011), charismatic leadership (Babcock-Roberson andStrickland, 2010) and authentic leadership (Walumbwa, Wang, Wang, Schaubroeck and Avolio, 2010) are all directly related to how engaged individuals are with their job. Although no published studies, to our knowledge, have examined leadership as a moderator of the relationship between engagement and employee behaviours, research in other domains has proposed that leadership moderates direct relationships, such as that between fairness perceptions and OCB (Johnson, Truxillo, Erdogan, Bauer and Hammer, 2009) and empowerment and OCB and turnover intentions (Harris, Wheeler and Kacmar, 2009).…”
Section: Leader-member Exchangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have, for example, demonstrated that transformational leadership (Tims, Bakker andXanthopoulou, 2011), charismatic leadership (Babcock-Roberson andStrickland, 2010) and authentic leadership (Walumbwa, Wang, Wang, Schaubroeck and Avolio, 2010) are all directly related to how engaged individuals are with their job. Although no published studies, to our knowledge, have examined leadership as a moderator of the relationship between engagement and employee behaviours, research in other domains has proposed that leadership moderates direct relationships, such as that between fairness perceptions and OCB (Johnson, Truxillo, Erdogan, Bauer and Hammer, 2009) and empowerment and OCB and turnover intentions (Harris, Wheeler and Kacmar, 2009).…”
Section: Leader-member Exchangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivational outcomes include being proactive and taking initiative (Sonnentag 2003;Hakanen et al 2008;Salanova and Schaufeli 2008), setting a high bar, feeling competent and striving for quality (Bakker 2011), and displaying helpful behavior, friendliness and being cooperative (Babcock-Roberson and Strickland 2010;Bakker 2011). Engaged people experience positive emotions and process information better (Hakanen and Schaufeli 2012).…”
Section: Consequences Of Work Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, various predictors of work engagement have been studied and these include organizational commitment distributive, procedural justice, rewards and recognition; person-job fit and person-organization fit; leadership style (Babcock-Roberson & Strickland, 2010;Hamid & Yahya, 2011;Kimura, 2011;Leithwood & Jantzi, 1999;Saks, 2006;Tims, Bakker, & Xanthopoulu, 2011). However, work engagement has been mostly analyzed by the job demands-resources model.…”
Section: Work Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%