“…The training status of participants varied, with recruited populations described as elite/professional (n = 18) [37,43,54,59,62,64,66,67,[69][70][71][72][73]75,77,80,81,83], sub-elite (n = 1) [71], national/international level (n = 4) [65,68,79,82], state-level (n = 1) [40], well/highly trained (n = 4) [43,56,63,76], trained (n = 4) [55,60,61,85], recreationally-trained (n = 2) [57,68], and active (n = 1) [58], with three studies not reporting training status [74,78]. Studies not reporting training status were included in the review as participants were described as athletes [74,78,84], and the active population were completing moderate-vigorous activity >4 days per week [58]. Participants were recruited from numerous sports, including Australian football (n = 3) [37,54,59], basketball (n = 2) [40,…”