2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-018-03107-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between global spinal alignment and pelvic orientation from standing to sitting following pedicle subtraction osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three articles compared PI change between pre- and post-operative patient data, and seven studies assessed PI change with different postures (Table 2). 7,2836 In a study of PI change using adult patients with spine deformity, there was 9.4° PI change between pre-operative and last follow up data. In this study, patients who did not have sacropelvic fixation showed 11.4° of PI change between pre- and post-operative data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three articles compared PI change between pre- and post-operative patient data, and seven studies assessed PI change with different postures (Table 2). 7,2836 In a study of PI change using adult patients with spine deformity, there was 9.4° PI change between pre-operative and last follow up data. In this study, patients who did not have sacropelvic fixation showed 11.4° of PI change between pre- and post-operative data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although patients with lumbopelvic problems tended to show large PI change, unlike healthy subjects, 31,32 not every patient with a lumbopelvic problem did. Zhao et al 35 compared pre- and post-operative PI change from standing to sitting in patients and did not show high PI change. Kargin et al 36 showed only 2.7° of PI change in patients pre- and post-operation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sagittal malalignment following osteotomy is a major determinant of clinical outcome in AS patients 2 , 6 . Given the complex interactional compensatory mechanisms between spine and pelvis, it is difficult for the surgeon to control and correct sagittal malalignment, especially to restore the neutral pelvic position 11 , 13 . Moreover, the retroversion of pelvis cannot be corrected directly, and is restored mainly by reconstructing lumbar lordosis and spinopelvic harmony 12 , 20 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predicting sagittal alignment and knowing the required degree of osteotomy can be of great help in designing a successful surgical plan. However, there is no clear method to predict the postoperative sagittal alignment for AS kyphosis, especially to evaluate the change of pelvic posture after osteotomy 11 13 , which might hamper the development of an appropriate surgical plan. In adult spinal deformity (ASD), Lafage et al 14 , 15 proposed two formulae to predict the postoperative pelvic tilt (PT) and SVA, and guide the formulation of surgical plans, which contributed to resolving the problem in ASD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reasons for that might be, that spinopelvic disorders often are aggravated in patients with significantly impaired hip function. [9][10][11][12][13] Due to improvement of the hip function and the reduction of the groin pain, the spine symptoms might be also influenced in a positive way. Further, placing and securing the pelvis in the lateral decubitus position and using clinical parameters and anatomic structures for implant placement (Ranawat sign, transverse acetabular ligament) produced good clinical and radiographic results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%