2009
DOI: 10.1108/02635570910926618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between knowledge management enablers and performance

Abstract: PurposeThis paper aims to study the correlation between knowledge management (KM) enablers and performance indices of KM.Design/methodology/approachReferring to the literature reviews, it attempts to construct the KM process performance index, analyze its importance, and further analyze a company's characteristics, the relationship between KM enablers with the importance of the KM process performance index, and try to adopt four KM enablers as independent variables. Lastly, it intends to explore whether the re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
167
1
10

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(42 reference statements)
10
167
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Organizational culture is considered as a complicated set of values, beliefs, behaviors, and symbols affecting the knowledge management in organizations (Ho, 2009). Thus, a friendly knowledge culture is regarded as that the main factors influencing the knowledge management and application of its outcomes (Miils and Smith, 2010).…”
Section: Organizational Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organizational culture is considered as a complicated set of values, beliefs, behaviors, and symbols affecting the knowledge management in organizations (Ho, 2009). Thus, a friendly knowledge culture is regarded as that the main factors influencing the knowledge management and application of its outcomes (Miils and Smith, 2010).…”
Section: Organizational Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning KM appraisal, three dimensions were used: knowledge creation (CR), sharing (SH) and utilization (UT) (Abd Rahman et al, 2013;Chang & Lin, 2015;Ho, 2009;Wu & Chen, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studying the moderating role of the KM process on the relationship between training and organizational effectiveness, Abd Rahman, Ng, Sambasivan, and Wong (2013) used four dimensions of the KM process: Knowledge acquisition, application, conversion and protection. Ho (2009) mentioned five dimensions of KM, namely creating, accumulating, sharing, utilizing and internalizing knowledge. Investigating the relationship between KM and OP, Hsiao, Chen, and Chang (2011) adopted two dimensions to assess KM capacity comprising the acquisition and dissemination of knowledge.…”
Section: Knowledge Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Estos elementos son conocidos como factores habilitadores o factores de éxito de la GC, los cuales pueden ser entendidos como mecanismos organizacionales para, intencional y consistentemente, desarrollar conocimiento (Heeseok Lee & Byounggu Choi, 2003). Estos factores tienen una fuerte influencia en el desempeño de la organización en la GC y en el desempeño y eficiencia de la organización en general (Allameh, Zare, & Davoodi, 2011;Bhatti, Hussain, & Iqbal, 2013;Heeseok Lee & Byounggu Choi, 2003;C.-F. Ho, Hsieh, & Hung, 2014;C.-T. Ho, 2009;Yeh, Lai, & Ho, 2006 Es importante destacar que en el contexto particular de las ODS, la GC y sus factores de éxito han sido concebidos como elementos claves pues el principal activo y también el principal producto de estas organizaciones es el conocimiento en diversas formas (Aurum, Daneshgar, & Ward, 2008;Bjørnson & Dingsøyr, 2008;Dingsøyr, Bjornson, & Shull, 2009;Rus & Lindvall, 2002). En este orden de ideas, el propósito de este artículo es presentar los resultados de una investigación que busca responder a la pregunta: ¿cuáles son los factores de éxito y las barreras que inciden en la implementación de procesos de GC en las ODS colombianas?…”
Section: Introductionunclassified