2018
DOI: 10.11114/jets.v6i10.3613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship Between Physical Fitness Levels and Digit Ratio (2D:4D) of High School Students Engaged Actively in Sports

Abstract: The aim of this study is to examine the association between physical fitness and 2D:4D finger ratio of high school students engaged actively in sports. 23 licensed male athletes and 23 sedentary (n=46) high school students participated in the study voluntarily. The participants age, body weight, body mass index, 2D:4D finger measurement values were recorded and 20 meter shuttle run, 30 meter sprint, sit and reach test, standing long jump and hand grip strength tests were applied on the participants. The data o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to acknowledge that muscular fitness is a multidimensional construct, and while it is specific to the muscle group, type of muscle action, muscle contraction, contraction velocity, equipment, and joint range of motion, we only included studies that measured muscular fitness using HGS. Several studies have examined relationships for other measures of muscular fitness, including lower body absolute strength (Eler, 2018a;Folland et al, 2012), upper body relative strength (Eklund et al, 2020;Güler, 2018;Kociuba et al, 2017;Kozieł et al, 2017), both lower body power (Eler, 2018a;Güler, 2018;Gümüs ¸& Tutkun, 2018;Hsu et al, 2018;Kociuba et al, 2017;Kozieł et al, 2017) and upper body power (Cho, 2020), and abdominal/core endurance (Kociuba et al, 2017;Kozieł et al, 2017). Collectively, most studies (Cho, 2020;Eklund et al, 2020;Eler, 2018a;Güler, 2018;Hsu et al, 2018;Kociuba et al, 2017;Kozieł et al, 2017) found that 2D:4D was a negligible-tomoderate negative correlate of other measures of muscular fitness, which broadly supports our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to acknowledge that muscular fitness is a multidimensional construct, and while it is specific to the muscle group, type of muscle action, muscle contraction, contraction velocity, equipment, and joint range of motion, we only included studies that measured muscular fitness using HGS. Several studies have examined relationships for other measures of muscular fitness, including lower body absolute strength (Eler, 2018a;Folland et al, 2012), upper body relative strength (Eklund et al, 2020;Güler, 2018;Kociuba et al, 2017;Kozieł et al, 2017), both lower body power (Eler, 2018a;Güler, 2018;Gümüs ¸& Tutkun, 2018;Hsu et al, 2018;Kociuba et al, 2017;Kozieł et al, 2017) and upper body power (Cho, 2020), and abdominal/core endurance (Kociuba et al, 2017;Kozieł et al, 2017). Collectively, most studies (Cho, 2020;Eklund et al, 2020;Eler, 2018a;Güler, 2018;Hsu et al, 2018;Kociuba et al, 2017;Kozieł et al, 2017) found that 2D:4D was a negligible-tomoderate negative correlate of other measures of muscular fitness, which broadly supports our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies reported that the relative lengths of the second finger to the fourth finger, known as the digit ratio (2D:4D ratio), is thought to be a strong indicator for testosterone exposure during the embryonic period 1,2,3 . Depending on the potency of prenatal hormones the 2D:4D ratio is sexually dimorphic, which is inversely proportional to testosterone level in males and directly proportional to estrogen level in females during embryonic period 1,2,3,4 . In general, because of the number of androgen receptors in the fourth finger is high, this finger is longer, and the 2D:4D ratio is less than one in male, while in female the second finger is longer, and this ratio is greater than one due to estrogen exposure 1,5,6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%