2020
DOI: 10.3390/rel11120673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship between Psycholinguistic Features of Religious Words and Core Dimensions of Religiosity: A Survey Study with Japanese Participants

Abstract: Previous studies have reported that religious words and religiosity affect mental processes and behaviors. However, it is unclear what psycholinguistic features of religious words (e.g., familiarity, imageability, and emotional aspects) are associated with each dimension of personal religiosity (intellect, ideology, public practice, private practice, and experience). The purpose of this study was to examine whether and how the above-mentioned psycholinguistic features of religious words correlate with each of … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Words consist of associations between word forms and referents, including sensorimotor, emotional, and abstract features, gained through the learners' experiences (Paivio, 1986;Pulvermüller, 2003;Kambara et al, 2020). In the dual coding theory of associations between verbal (word forms) and nonverbal features (referents), the Canadian psycholinguist Allan Paivio proposed that the associations between word forms and referents are learned in three differential levels of processing, including representational, referential, and associative processing (Paivio, 1971;Paivio, 1986;Paivio, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Words consist of associations between word forms and referents, including sensorimotor, emotional, and abstract features, gained through the learners' experiences (Paivio, 1986;Pulvermüller, 2003;Kambara et al, 2020). In the dual coding theory of associations between verbal (word forms) and nonverbal features (referents), the Canadian psycholinguist Allan Paivio proposed that the associations between word forms and referents are learned in three differential levels of processing, including representational, referential, and associative processing (Paivio, 1971;Paivio, 1986;Paivio, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiment consisted of four tasks. In the first one, by using five-point semantic differential scales, participants evaluated each haptic stimulus associated with haptic sensations (e.g., stickiness) [ 27 ] and emotional feelings consisting of familiarity, preference, and arousal [ 28 , 29 ]. In the second one, we asked the participants to learn associative pairs of new word forms and haptic referents (H condition) and word forms only (W condition) as learning tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Please choose the most appropriate number from 1 to 5 for each evaluative item.” The scales of the evaluative items were semantic differential scales [ 30 ]. These semantic differential scales were also based on theoretical linguistic and psycholinguistic research [ 13 , 14 , 28 , 32 , 47 ]. To control the order of the presentation of the stimuli, the order of the evaluative items was pseudorandomized between participants by preparing two lists of items to evaluate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%