The relationship between pubertal hormones and brain plasticity: Implications for cognitive training in adolescence

Abstract

Adolescence may mark a sensitive period for the development of higher-order cognition through enhanced plasticity of cortical circuits. At the same time, animal research indicates that pubertal hormones may represent one key mechanism for closing sensitive periods in the associative neocortex, thereby resulting in decreased plasticity of cortical circuits in adolescence. In the present review, we set out to solve some of the existing ambiguity and examine how hormonal changes associated with pubertal onset may modulate plasticity in higher-order cognition during adolescence. We build on existing age-comparative cognitive training studies to explore how the potential for change in neural resources and behavioral repertoire differs across age groups. We review animal and human brain imaging studies, which demonstrate a link between brain development, neurochemical mechanisms of plasticity, and pubertal hormones. Overall, the existent literature indicates that pubertal hormones play a pivotal role in regulating the mechanisms of experience-dependent plasticity during adolescence. However, the extent to which hormonal changes associated with pubertal onset increase or decrease brain plasticity may depend on the specific cognitive domain, the sex, and associated brain networks. We discuss implications for future research and suggest that systematical longitudinal assessments of pubertal change together with cognitive training interventions may be a fruitful way toward a better understanding of adolescent plasticity. As

Heightened sensitivity to the caregiving environment during adolescence: implications for recovery following early‐life adversity

“…In adolescence, regardless of early environmental experiences, youth with more positive caregiving in adolescence exhibited higher behavioral sensitivity to reward, better executive functioning, and lower symptoms of internalizing and externalizing psychopathology. Together, these findings suggest a heightened sensitivity to environmental influences during adolescence, consistent with models of adolescent neuroplasticity (Larsen & Luna, 2018; Laube, van den Bos, & Fandakova, 2020), as well as the potential for recovery during this developmental period after exposure to early‐life adversity.…”

“…At age 16, the majority of adolescents in the BEIP were in the later stages of pubertal development (with mean Tanner stage scores greater than 4). In order to truly understand the mechanism underlying this period of increased plasticity, future work should explore the interactions among the early caregiving environment, the adolescent caregiving environment, and pubertal hormones in a sample of adolescents that spans the entire pubertal period (Laube et al, 2020).…”

Skeletal maturity predicts cognitive abilities in human adolescents

“…The orchestrating function of pubertal hormones behind overall adolescent progress seems clear and assumes an explanatory role. Pubertal hormone levels are correlated with bone age [26][27][28] , time bodily growth 97 , cortical pruning 98,99 , and emotional 1,4 and cognitive 100,101 development in adolescence. The cascade of events during the pubertal transformation of a child into an adult is coordinated on individual timescales, and any attempt to assess adolescent brain and cognitive function requires the determination of the individual timescales.…”

Latino Parent-Child English Language Fluency: Implications for Maternal School Involvement

“…This is an important transition period for adolescents because they become more responsible for their schoolwork and there is more variation in parental school involvement (Grolnick et al, 2015). Developmentally, puberty is a critical stage in which to identify risks and protective factors for youth because it marks a period of brain plasticity in which interventions are more likely to be successful (Laube et al, 2020). Finally, in our examinations of dropout patterns within this school district, we noted that although few students dropped out between elementary school and 7th grade, there were students who did not transition between junior high school and high school.…”