1990
DOI: 10.2307/1940332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship between Reproduction and Survival in Known‐Aged California Gulls

Abstract: Survival from 1984 to 1985 was compared among known-aged California Gulls 4-23 yr old. Data supported a hypothesis of increasing reproductive effort with age. A flood during 1984 terminated breeding during the incubation phase of part of the colony, thus permitting an estimate of reproductive costs. Yearly survival of gulls whose nest flooded was 92% compared to 72% among gulls that carried out the reproductive cycle. Adult survival was inversely related to level of fledging success in 1984. Survival declined … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
61
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We investigated the changes in trophic ecology (dietary shift) and demographic parameters (population size and survival) of breeding YLGs that were attributable to the two consecutive anthropogenic perturbations. Life-history theory predicts that under limited food access, long-lived organisms will forego reproduction to avoid negatively affecting their future survival (Pugesek andDiem 1990, Oro et al 1999). Thus, we expected that food limitation would trigger a dietary shift and differential resource exploitation, affecting breeding performance (Oro et al 1995, Steigerwald et al 2015 but not individual survival probability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We investigated the changes in trophic ecology (dietary shift) and demographic parameters (population size and survival) of breeding YLGs that were attributable to the two consecutive anthropogenic perturbations. Life-history theory predicts that under limited food access, long-lived organisms will forego reproduction to avoid negatively affecting their future survival (Pugesek andDiem 1990, Oro et al 1999). Thus, we expected that food limitation would trigger a dietary shift and differential resource exploitation, affecting breeding performance (Oro et al 1995, Steigerwald et al 2015 but not individual survival probability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these studies are cross-sectional in nature and analyse the reproduction of a known-aged cohort in a single year or from a few years of aggregate data. Researchers have interpreted data from these studies as evidence for senescence (Charlesworth, 1980;Mills and Shaw, 1980); however, a recent paper suggests an alternate hypothesis (Pugesek and Diem, 1990). Declines in reproductive performance noted in cross-sectional studies may be due to multiple reproductive strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few studies, however, have tried to correct for compositional change within the population (5, 22, 24, 25, 27, 33-35, 42, 45, 46). Different authors have speculated about the importance of selective disappearance and individual changes, but they have not been able to quantify the contributions (15,18,25,27,28,31,33,35,42,45,(47)(48)(49)(50). Such quantification can be carried out using the approach that we are proposing here.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%