1986
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1986)114<1539:trbsmc>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship between Satellite Measured Convective Bursts and Tropical Cyclone Intensification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
50
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The outbreaks of deep convection have been given great attention with different terms since the work of Gentry et al (1970), who identified them from cold brightness temperatures in satellite images and recognized their significance in TC intensification. They were termed as ''circular exhaust clouds'' by Gentry et al (1970), extreme convection by Gray (1998), and convective bursts (CBs) or ''hot towers'' by many other studies (e.g., Steranka et al 1986;Rodgers et al 1998;Heymsfield et al 2001;Guimond et al 2010). In this study, we will use the more common term, that is, CB, which is defined herein as a deep, intense convective system consisting of one or more updrafts of at least 15 m s 21 in the upper troposphere (i.e., typically above z 5 11 km) that are resolvable by the model finest grid size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outbreaks of deep convection have been given great attention with different terms since the work of Gentry et al (1970), who identified them from cold brightness temperatures in satellite images and recognized their significance in TC intensification. They were termed as ''circular exhaust clouds'' by Gentry et al (1970), extreme convection by Gray (1998), and convective bursts (CBs) or ''hot towers'' by many other studies (e.g., Steranka et al 1986;Rodgers et al 1998;Heymsfield et al 2001;Guimond et al 2010). In this study, we will use the more common term, that is, CB, which is defined herein as a deep, intense convective system consisting of one or more updrafts of at least 15 m s 21 in the upper troposphere (i.e., typically above z 5 11 km) that are resolvable by the model finest grid size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3c). The time window of 12 hours was determined by taking account of the duration time of the convective bursts, that is, 9 hours or longer (Steranka et al 1986). Two distinct CBs, one from 0200 UTC to 1100 UTC 4 October (hereafter CB1) and the other from 0000 UTC to 1300 UTC 5 October (hereafter CB2), were recognized by a sudden drop of TB (IR1) by about 30 K. CB2 occurred in the TC development phase, when MSW was increasing at the rate of 12.8 m s −1 day −1 .…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Tc Wind Field Captured By Amvsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TC inner core is generally defined as the area within a radius 2−3 times the radius of maximum wind (RMW). Deep convection in developing TCs often takes the form of "convective bursts (CBs)" (Riehl and Malkus 1961), the characteristics of which have been studied by using satellite observations (Steranka et al 1986;Jiang 2012). The CBs precondition the establishment of TC inner core by inducing axisymmetrization, which leads to TC intensification (Miyamoto and Takemi 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the late 1980s, Steranka et al (1986) found that maximum winds of TCs in most cases increased by 5 m s 21 or more within 24 h, during which time intense convection with high cloud tops lasted more than 9 h. Based on a composite analyses of airborne Doppler observations, Rogers et al (2013) reported that intensifying TCs had a relatively large amount of tall and vigorous convection [i.e., convective bursts (CBs)] inside the RMW compared with steady-state TCs. Sanger et al (2014) examined the spinup mechanism of rapidly intensifying Super Typhoon Jangmi (2008) and reported the observation of multiple rotating updrafts and a huge upright updraft with strong, low-level convergence and intense relative vorticity inside the RMW.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%