2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2012.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between sea ice break-up, water mass variation, chlorophyll biomass, and sedimentation in the northern Bering Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, summer SCM are prevalent in the northern Bering Sea due to a thicker pycnocline that provides a subsurface habitat with sufficient light for SCM development [ Stabeno et al . ; Cooper et al ., ]. Overall, the impact of not capturing the SCM is likely to be minimal; it should only affect our reported NPP numbers in the summer after surface nutrients are exhausted, and then only in the northern Bering Sea.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In contrast, summer SCM are prevalent in the northern Bering Sea due to a thicker pycnocline that provides a subsurface habitat with sufficient light for SCM development [ Stabeno et al . ; Cooper et al ., ]. Overall, the impact of not capturing the SCM is likely to be minimal; it should only affect our reported NPP numbers in the summer after surface nutrients are exhausted, and then only in the northern Bering Sea.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…1), concentration 4 and thickness 8,9 in the Arctic 10 interacts with atmospheric and oceanic forcings via ice-albedo and ice-insulation feedbacks to amplify regional warming and stimulate further ice loss 4 . The main focus of ecological repercussions of projected sea ice loss has been on pagophillic species, whose dynamics have already been perturbed by diminishing sea ice cover 3,5,[11][12][13][14][15][16] . In contrast, indirect weather-mediated effects of continued ice loss on terrestrial species are less clear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, during our cruises, chlorophyll concentrations in the top 5e6 m were often far lower than those at greater depths, with chlorophyll maxima commonly occurring at depths of 20e40 m ( Fig. 10 in Cooper et al, 2012). Our estimates of trophic demand indicate that calculations based on satellite imagery may underestimate annual primary production by 50% or more.…”
Section: Estimated Inputs Of Fresh Microalgaementioning
confidence: 65%
“…There were no measurements for our study area of the biomasses of meiofauna, protists, or bacteria; values we used were based on surveys of the literature for soft sediments (see Supplementary Material). For the top 1 cm of sediments, standing stocks of chlorophyll a and total organic C were measured at each station (Grebmeier and Cooper, 1995;Cooper et al, 2012), and chlorophyll a was converted to gC of fresh microalgae (see Supplementary Material). Resulting values of the biomass of fresh microalgae were subtracted from total organic carbon in sediments to yield biomass of sediment organic matter.…”
Section: Study Area Trophic Groups and Biomassesmentioning
confidence: 99%