1986
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-3472(86)80069-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between social status and resting metabolic rate in great tits (Parus major) and pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
86
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, physiological and ecological data for other bird species suggest that relationships exist between metabolic rate and ¢tness. For instance, a positive correlation between social dominance and the BMR has been reported for four species of passerine birds (RÖskaft et al 1986;Hogstad 1987;Bryant & Newton 1994). Assuming that dominance would confer an increased ¢tness, through either higher reproductive output or an increased survival rate, those individuals with the highest ¢tness would then be expected to also have the highest BMR.…”
Section: Repeatability Of Bmr In Kittiwakes C Bech and Others 2165mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, physiological and ecological data for other bird species suggest that relationships exist between metabolic rate and ¢tness. For instance, a positive correlation between social dominance and the BMR has been reported for four species of passerine birds (RÖskaft et al 1986;Hogstad 1987;Bryant & Newton 1994). Assuming that dominance would confer an increased ¢tness, through either higher reproductive output or an increased survival rate, those individuals with the highest ¢tness would then be expected to also have the highest BMR.…”
Section: Repeatability Of Bmr In Kittiwakes C Bech and Others 2165mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This contrasts with an increasingly prevalent view that variation in competitive ability is adaptive and arises because the benefits of competitiveness can be outweighed by associated costs [7][8][9][10][11][12]. Commonly, these costs might include fighting [13], higher exposure to stress hormones [14] and elevated metabolic rate leading to increased food demands [15,16]. Consequently, under some circumstances, relatively poor competitors can paradoxically outperform good competitors [17,18], suggesting that variation in competitive ability may reflect alternative behavioural strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite their lower dominance rank compared to l styear males, alpha female willow tits Parus montanus show an equal nutritional status during winter, most probably resulting from protection against dominant flock members and enhanced access to preferred resources provided by their alpha mates (Hogstad 1992). Due to energetic constraints, securing mate protection and mate access to preferred resources might however entail important metabolic costs for the alpha males (see Roskaft et al 1986;Hogstad 1987b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%