2014
DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2014.904177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship Between System Effectiveness and Subjective Usability Scores Using the System Usability Scale

Abstract: This article examines the relationship between users' subjective usability assessments, as measured using the System Usability Scale (SUS), and the ISO metric of effectiveness, using task success as the measure. The article reports the results of two studies designed to explore the relationship between SUS scores and user success rates for a variety of interfaces. The first study was a field study, where stereotypical usability assessments on a variety of products and services were performed. The second study … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From the usability perspective, specialists and patients use the VE to conduct a rehabilitation task and respond standard questionnaires to indicate their perception on usability factors (e.g. Technology Acceptance Model [9], System Usability Scale [10]) [11]. Additionally, from the performance perspective, the capability of the patient to conduct the exercises or tasks in the VE is evaluated, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the usability perspective, specialists and patients use the VE to conduct a rehabilitation task and respond standard questionnaires to indicate their perception on usability factors (e.g. Technology Acceptance Model [9], System Usability Scale [10]) [11]. Additionally, from the performance perspective, the capability of the patient to conduct the exercises or tasks in the VE is evaluated, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 59th Annual Meeting -2015 measurement by Kortum & Peres (2014), where they also found this difference in correlation between success data reported in binary and continuous form. However, no correlation was observed between SUS scores and standardized efficiency at the individual level.…”
Section: Sus Scorementioning
confidence: 53%
“…Each participant was given one of the four websites and asked to repeat those same tasks five times (t1–t5). This website task was motived by several existing studies, which asked participants to visit certain websites and perform a certain task using the websites (Cuddihy & Spyridakis, ; Kortum & Peres, ; Wang & Senecal, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the scenario, participants were described that they wanted information about movies they want to see and repetitively checked information from the website. Then, participants were asked to complete the following tasks sequentially: This website task was motived by several existing studies, which asked participants to visit certain websites and perform a certain task using the websites (Cuddihy & Spyridakis, 2012;Kortum & Peres, 2014;Wang & Senecal, 2007).…”
Section: Scenario Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%