The Relationship Between the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center—A Profile in Synergy

Abstract

In the synergistic evolution of their research, educational, and clinical programs, the University of Pittsburgh (Pitt) School of Medicine (SOM) and the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) have followed one core principle: What is good for one is good for both. The collaboration is underpinned by UPMC's commitment to its community mission, including support for the academic and research objectives of the SOM. UPMC's conceptual origin was fostered by its experience with Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic in the 1970s. Over time, UPMC acquired other hospitals through merger and negotiation and, by 2008, had grown into a $7 billion global health enterprise. From the outset, the senior leaders of both UPMC and Pitt committed to collaborative decision making on all key issues. Under this coordinated decision-making model, UPMC oversees all clinical activity, including that from a consolidated physicians' practice plan. Pitt remains the guardian of all academic priorities, particularly faculty-based research. UPMC's steady financial success underpins the model. A series of interrelated agreements formally defines the relationship between Pitt and UPMC, including shared board seats and UPMC's committed ongoing financial support of the SOM. In addition, the two institutions have jointly made research growth a priority. The payoff from this dynamic has been a steadily growing Pitt research portfolio; enhanced growth, visibility, and stature for UPMC, the SOM, and Pitt as a whole; and the sustained success of UPMC's clinical enterprise, which now has an international scope. Given the current stagnation in the National Institutes of Health budget, the Pitt-UPMC experience may be instructive to other academic health centers.

How change comes: translating biological research into care

“…9,10 This was not always the case; the old Maudsley was an excellent example of academic research integrating almost completely into clinical practice. It is interesting to speculate as to why this faded somewhat.…”

Governing Academic Medical Center Systems: Evaluating and Choosing Among Alternative Governance Approaches

“…Further, separation of the two entities reduces the financial risk to the one entity if the other encounters financial difficulties. There are reports that spin-off has allowed hospitals to compete more successfully and to thrive in a business sense (e.g., Florida [Barrett, 2008], Colorado [Larson, 2012], and the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center [UPMC] [Levine et al, 2008]).…”

Building a Research Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Part II

“…UPMC has made research growth a priority, and through its support of the medical school it has enabled Pitt's medical school to become a top 10 funding NIH program. 5 UPMC support of the medical school is an average of approximately $200 million annually, 5 and the department of PM&R has received funding based on meeting system-established goals related to the UPMC rehabilitation network. The goal of this support is to improve rehabilitation care and to position UPMC and its clinical rehabilitation program as one of the top programs in the country.…”