The Relationship between unclos and imo Instruments

Abstract

The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (unclos) is widely viewed as a “constitutive” instrument that provides a legal framework that is being filled in, rounded out and complemented by existing and subsequently enacted international agreements and customary international law. The International Maritime Organization (imo) is the preeminent international organization with competence to establish international rules and standards for the safety, security and environmental performance of international shipping. In other words, on matters relating to international shipping, unclos outlines the rights and obligations of States parties in various maritime zones that must be exercised and fulfilled through implementation instruments under the auspices of imo. This article will examine and discuss the relationship between unclos and imo instruments. First, it will provide an overview of imo, including its historical background, its mandates and structure, and the major instruments that are under its auspices. It will then look at the relationship between unclos and imo, and discuss how imo and its instruments have been incorporated into unclos. Furthermore, it will discuss the role of imo and its instruments in assisting States to exercise their rights and fulfil their obligations under unclos.

Further Development of the Law of the Sea Convention in the Anthropocene Era: The Case of Anthropogenic Underwater Noise

“…The IMO has adopted several instruments, including, inter alia, the MARPOL and its Annexes as principal sources of the rules and standards on pollution from vessels that are regarded as implementing the obligation under Article 211 (1) of the UNCLOS to establish such "international rules and standards to prevent, reduce, and control pollution of the marine environment from vessels". When formulating international rules and standards, the IMO must ensure that they adhere to the basic principles outlined by the UNCLOS [137]. Given that the UNCLOS has a general obligation to address AUN, the IMO as the sole international organization for international shipping should also adopt relevant rules and standards to address the AUN from shipping.…”

Rising Seas and Uncertainties: Establishing Static Maritime Borders to Ensure Equity in the Face of Sea Level Rise

“…Extending 200 nautical miles from the baseline, a state's exclusive economic zone (EEZ) represents the oceanic area over which it has complete economic control, including exclusive privileges over fishing, mining, and other resource extraction. The International Maritime Organization (IMO), a specialized UN agency, oversees implementation of the legal frameworks defined in the UNCLOS treaty through rules and regulations for matters such as maritime shipping, environmental conservation, and security (Beckman and Sun 2017). The IMO is not specifically empowered to enforce its UNCLOS-based regulations with tangible consequences.…”

The international convention for the safety of life at sea: highlighting interrelations of measures towards effective risk mitigation

“…SOLAS 1974 applies to all passenger ships and cargo ships over 500 GT engaged on international voyages (unless provided otherwise in the Convention). The MSC (and its six sub-committees 3 ) of IMO deal with matters on maritime safety and the amendments to SOLAS 1974 (Beckman and Sun 2017). The structure of the SOLAS 1974 leads from Chapter one, which includes the specifications of types of vessels on which the Convention applies and follows by providing necessary definitions used with the Instrument.…”