2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between use of Web 2.0 tools by prospective science teachers and their biotechnology literacy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At this point, it is thought that web 2.0 tools can have a positive effect on students' course achievement and attitudes in educational environments, especially in the online education process, and make significant contributions to the operation of the teaching process both for the teacher and the student. The positive opinions of students and teachers on the use of web 2.0 tools in the educational environment and their positive effectiveness in the teaching process has been found in many studies in the national and international literature (Altıok, Yükseltürk & Üçgül, 2017;Bolatlı & Korucu, 2018;Bünül, 2019;Çetin, 2020;Elmahdi, Al-Hattami & Fawzi, 2018;Fırat & Köksal, 2017;Gürleroğlu, 2019;Gürsoy & Göksun, 2019;Ibrahim & Alqahtani, 2018;Jena, Bhattacharjee, Devi & Barman, 2020;Kompen et al, 2019;Rachmawati & Purwati, 2021;Say & Yıldırım, 2020;Timur, Timur, Arcagök & Öztürk, 2020).…”
Section: Figure 1 Classification Of Web 20 Tools That Can Be Used In the Teaching Processmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At this point, it is thought that web 2.0 tools can have a positive effect on students' course achievement and attitudes in educational environments, especially in the online education process, and make significant contributions to the operation of the teaching process both for the teacher and the student. The positive opinions of students and teachers on the use of web 2.0 tools in the educational environment and their positive effectiveness in the teaching process has been found in many studies in the national and international literature (Altıok, Yükseltürk & Üçgül, 2017;Bolatlı & Korucu, 2018;Bünül, 2019;Çetin, 2020;Elmahdi, Al-Hattami & Fawzi, 2018;Fırat & Köksal, 2017;Gürleroğlu, 2019;Gürsoy & Göksun, 2019;Ibrahim & Alqahtani, 2018;Jena, Bhattacharjee, Devi & Barman, 2020;Kompen et al, 2019;Rachmawati & Purwati, 2021;Say & Yıldırım, 2020;Timur, Timur, Arcagök & Öztürk, 2020).…”
Section: Figure 1 Classification Of Web 20 Tools That Can Be Used In the Teaching Processmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Lin, Ganapathy and Kaur (2018) and Zarzycka-Piskorz (2016) have found that students have more internalized the course and had fun as a result of their studies investigating the effect of gamification in higher education using Web 2.0 tools. Similarly, Fırat and Köksal (2017) and Efe (2014) concluded that student teachers use Web 2.0 tools mostly for entertainment, accessing information and web-based learning.…”
Section: Purpose Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is based on ensuring that its business system runs alone, and extracts part of its information to the educational information platform. On the basis of the establishment of the central library, it can provide the degree data opening API for the third-party authorities, and the third party obtains these open data to carry out its own business implementation (Stasik, 2017;Fırat and Köksal, 2017;Han, 2017).…”
Section: The Architecture Of Educational Information Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speed is an important feature of Web 2.0. But Web 2.0 websites have a lot of updates contents every day, so Web 2.0 sites are needed to adapt quickly to changes in demand, so lightweight development tools are used(Stasik, 2017;Fırat and Köksal, 2017;Han, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%