1991
DOI: 10.1016/0032-5910(91)80176-j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between Young's modulus of elasticity of organic solids and their molecular structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
62
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
7
62
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting values are comparable to protein crystals (165 MPa), [29] hyperbranced macromolecules (190 MPa), [27] and low-density polyethylene (100 MPa), [33] but up to 25 times softer than crystalline acetaminophen (8.4 GPa), [34] high-density polyethylene (7.5 GPa), [33] and aspirin (7.1 GPa). [35] Two important conclusions can be drawn from the AFM data. First, the crystals clearly become less stiff following the SCSC transformation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The resulting values are comparable to protein crystals (165 MPa), [29] hyperbranced macromolecules (190 MPa), [27] and low-density polyethylene (100 MPa), [33] but up to 25 times softer than crystalline acetaminophen (8.4 GPa), [34] high-density polyethylene (7.5 GPa), [33] and aspirin (7.1 GPa). [35] Two important conclusions can be drawn from the AFM data. First, the crystals clearly become less stiff following the SCSC transformation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These values should be compared to Youngs moduli of 1-15 GPa for many molecular solids. [29][30][31][32] Second, for the two crystals where aY oungs modulus could be measured for different crystal faces (a-glycine and l-alanine), the results are strongly facet-dependent:variance up to 70 % for a-glycine and 65 %f or l-alanine.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Mechanical and physicochemical predictions from molecular structure Several attempts have been made at predicting the physicochemical properties of materials from their molecular and crystal structure (Roberts et al 1991(Roberts et al , 1995(Roberts et al , 2000Newton et al 1993 ;Sheridan et al 1995 ;Payne et al 1996Payne et al , 1999. The ability of a powder to deform and adhere during compression is critical in tablet manufacture.…”
Section: Predictions Based On the Physicochemical Properties Of Raw Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need for eOE ective and reliable prediction of mechanical properties has stimulated many publications in this area. Roberts et al (1991Roberts et al ( , 1995 and Newton et al (1993) originally used the cohesive energy density of powders to predict the tensile strength and Young' s modulus of compacts prepared from a series of simple molecular solids. It was concluded that while trends could be predicted, the exact magnitude of the change could not be predicted, possibly as a result of the in¯uence of particle size, changes in deformation mechanics with pressure and the unpredictable nature of cracks and aws within the material.…”
Section: Predictions Based On the Physicochemical Properties Of Raw Mmentioning
confidence: 99%