The Relationship of Conduction Disorder and Prognosis in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

Abstract

Objective. Conduction disorders with a widened QRS are associated with poor prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Conduction disorders include left bundle branch block (LBBB), right bundle branch block (RBBB), and nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (NICD). Previous studies did not have conflicting results regarding the type of bundle branch block (BBB) with the worst prognosis, and few studies have focused on the prognosis of patients with NICD. Methods. Patients with ACS were enrolled between January 2005 and December 2019, and their medical history (International Classification of Diseases codes) was obtained from the Chang Gung Research Database. Age, sex, comorbidities, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and drug use were compared between the patients with and without conduction disorders. The following clinical outcomes were compared between patients with and without conduction disorders: heart failure (HF) hospitalization, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, and all-cause mortality. After propensity score matching, the Kaplan–Meier curve analysis for HF hospitalization, CV mortality, and all-cause mortality were compared among patients with LBBB, RBBB, and NICD. Results. This study enrolled a total of 33970 participants and involved 3392 and 30578 patients with and without conduction disorders, respectively. Older age and a higher prevalence of comorbidities were noted in patients with conduction disorders. Lower mean LVEF was exhibited in the patients with conduction disorders (with vs. without; 44.64 ± 20.73% vs. 49.85 ± 20.63%; p < 0.001 ). During the 3-year follow-up period, higher incidences of HF hospitalization (21.55% vs. 17.51%; p < 0.001 ), CV mortality (17.98% vs. 12.14%; p < 0.001 ), and all-cause mortality (38.86% vs. 31.15%; p < 0.001 ) were noted in the patients with conduction disorder. After ACS events, 10.0% of patients presented with conduction disorders, with LBBB in 3.3%, RBBB in 6.0%, and NICD in 0.7%. The lowest mean of LVEF was presented in the patients with NICD (LBBB vs. RBBB vs. NICD; 41.00 ± 19.47% vs. 47.73 ± 20.82% vs. 34.57 ± 20.02%; p < 0.001 ). Among the three groups, the highest incidence of HF hospitalization was noted in patients with LBBB after propensity score matching. The lowest incidence of CV and all-cause mortality was observed in patients with RBBB. After adjustment of age, gender, comorbidities, medication, and mean LVEF, those with LBBB had the highest hazard ratio for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) of 1.113 ( p = 0.029 ; 95% CI = 1.013–1.266). Conclusions. In the ACS population, patients with conduction delay had a poor prognosis due to a higher prevalence of comorbidities and lower mean LVEF. Among the patients with LBBB, RBBB, and NICD, those with LBBB and NICD had a higher incidence of HF hospitalization, CV mortality, and all-cause mortality. Patients with NICD had the lowest mean LVEF compared to those with LBBB and RBBB. Patients with LBBB had a significantly highest HR of MACE.

Impact of Coexisting Risk Factors on Outcomes in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Real-World Analysis Using the Taiwan Chang Gung Research Database

“…Studies conducted using the CGRD have been recognized for their high quality and positive impact on healthcare in Taiwan. Notably, the CGRD has been utilized for ACS research to explore the effects of conduction delay and the prognosis of real-world lipid control [ 15 , 16 ].…”