ResearchOne of the realities of contemporary society is the rapid emergence and growth of a knowledge-based economy owing to the use of information communication technology (ICT). Undoubtedly, universities are major roleplayers in knowledge generation.[1] This function of universities underpins the development of postgraduate (PG) students as competent knowledge generators and scholars. However, the ICT revolution is challenging many universities to transform their traditional approach towards research supervision into knowledge production.[2] The research supervision process is expected to transform research candidates into knowledge producers and managers, with research supervisors playing an informed, supportive role in students' research journeys.The dynamics and complexities of the current environment demand a change from conventional research supervision processes. Before 2000, PG students were full-time resident students, thus making it easy for supervisors to have close, personal and individualised contact with them.[2] The current environment, however, demands a change, as the old model is unsuitable for students and supervisors, who are now both more mobile. Furthermore, an increasing number of PG students work full time, making the traditional model of supervision inappropriate and obsolete. [3] Trudgett [4] acknowledges that high-quality supervision is strongly associated with the capacity of academic staff. PG research supervision requires sound knowledge in terms of research methodology, and facilitation and management skills from research supervisors. In developed countries, research supervision is one of the competencies of nursing education programmes. However, this is not the case in countries where the curriculum of health professionals appears static and outdated, [5] as in South Africa (SA). Until 2012, the SA Nursing Council (SANC) did not include research supervision in the training curriculum of nurse educators. This has been identified as a weakness, given that a nursing qualification requires a research project at both diploma and degree level.[6] Nurse educators have been learning to supervise research through trial and error, and/or by informal training, such as workshops.This gap in the training of nurse educators may result in low in-and output in the research supervision process. This, in turn, decreases the nature of support, guidance and facilitation provided to PG nursing students and consequently the reduced throughput of these students. Between 2000 and 2006, at the College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN), Durban, SA the average drop-out rate at Master's level for thesisbased coursework was 56%, while the completion rate for Master's and Doctoral students averaged 11% and 10%, respectively. [7] Furthermore, studies reported a rapidly increasing number of PG students, most of whom were underprepared with regard to research. [8][9][10] With the foregoing in mind, the following research questions directed this study:• What perceptions do PG nursing students...