1978
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8659(1978)107<853:trcomf>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relative Contributions of Methylmercury from Food or Water to Rainbow Trout (Salmo gairdneri) in a Controlled Laboratory Environment

Abstract: Rainbow trout accumulated methylmercury linearly during 24 days when continually exposed to methylmercury. Exposure was by means of water solutions (0.07‐1.33 μg Hg/liter), food consumption (8.0‐380.5 ng Hg/g fish per day) or both. Methylmercury accumulated from one source had no influence on the rate of uptake from the second source. Methylmercury accumulated from both sources was quantitatively additive, which validates a frequently used assumption. Food consumption rate and therefore growth rate had no infl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
31
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
5
31
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are in line with the regression equation computed by Phillips and Buhler (1978), who found the mercury accumulation rate (mg Hg g À1 day À1 ) to be y ¼ 0.084x, x being the concentration in water (mg Hg l À1 ); this leads to M ¼ 0.67T in our experiment, which fits reasonably well to the diagram in Figure 3. Rather, it is surprising that mortality ceased almost completely after day 10 (Figure 1), despite the fact that mercury apparently continued to accumulate in fish (since it was higher in survivors, Figure 3).…”
Section: Mercury Uptakesupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results are in line with the regression equation computed by Phillips and Buhler (1978), who found the mercury accumulation rate (mg Hg g À1 day À1 ) to be y ¼ 0.084x, x being the concentration in water (mg Hg l À1 ); this leads to M ¼ 0.67T in our experiment, which fits reasonably well to the diagram in Figure 3. Rather, it is surprising that mortality ceased almost completely after day 10 (Figure 1), despite the fact that mercury apparently continued to accumulate in fish (since it was higher in survivors, Figure 3).…”
Section: Mercury Uptakesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Although adults are likely to be less sensitive than alevins (Wobeser, 1975), they may be submitted to higher levels of intoxication by eating contaminated prey species (Jernelö v and Lann, 1971;Bryan, 1976;Phillips and Buhler, 1978). Furthermore, survivors may suffer from secondary growth and reproductive disorders, and transfer considerable amounts of mercury to their progeny (McKim et al, 1976).…”
Section: Jm Blanc Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been demonstrated in freshwater teleosts exposed to mercury (Phillips and Buhler, 1978), lead (Vighi, 1981), copper, and zinc (Dallinger and Kautzky, 1985), and is also applicable to cadmium. Although cadmium is widely distributed in natural waters as a result of industrial discharge and other human activities, it is mainly bound to ligands and this limits its toxicity to fish (Dallinger et al, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Whereas it has generally been assumed that fishes accumulate MeHg mainly from dietary sources through very efficient assimilation of this compound (Mason 2002), it is quite possible that, because of its highly efficient absorption properties, they accumulate it from the aqueous phase also. Experimental studies on the routes of methylmercury exposure in fishes are indeed rather controversial (Honda et al 1978, Phillips & Buhler 1978, Fujiki 1980, Hall et al 1997. Kinetic modeling now offers a powerful approach for delineating the exposure of different metal species and pathways (Wang et al 1997, 1998, Wang & Fisher 1999.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%