2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11524-007-9190-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relative Effect of Household and Workplace Smoking Restriction on Health Status Among Chinese Americans Living in New York City

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary location for SHS exposure for nonsmokers is in the home 10,11. Research in the U.S. and Australia has shown that home smoking bans (i.e., rules to restrict smoking in the household12) are effective in preventing smoking initiation,13,14 promoting quitting behaviors,15,16 and reducing nonsmokers’ exposure to SHS 1719…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary location for SHS exposure for nonsmokers is in the home 10,11. Research in the U.S. and Australia has shown that home smoking bans (i.e., rules to restrict smoking in the household12) are effective in preventing smoking initiation,13,14 promoting quitting behaviors,15,16 and reducing nonsmokers’ exposure to SHS 1719…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation of restriction on smoking at home and workplace can have an impact on a person's health status [16,23]. Smokers who are in the free smoking area has a tendency to successfully quit smoking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smokers who have enacted a home smoking ban may be seen as making an attempt to deal with their smoking and trying to become healthier (Verger et al, 2008). In terms of mental health, the presence of smoking bans in workplaces, public spaces, and the home have also been shown to assist in smoking cessation efforts that are, in turn, related to positive self-evaluation (Mills et al, 2009;Pizacani et al, 2004;Shelley et al, 2007;Soliman et al, 2004;.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collectively, research evidence suggests that the physical health benefits of smoking restrictions are widespread and include robust reductions in ETS-related morbidity and mortality, particularly heart disease, asthma, and other respiratory diseases, as well as improvements in indoor air quality, reductions in smoking rates, and decreases in the uptake of smoking among youth (Brownson et al, 1997;Farkas, Gilpin, Distefan, & Pierce, 1999;Proescholdbell, Chassin, & MacKinnon, 2000;Shelley, Yerneni, Hung, Das, & Fahs, 2007;Szabo, White, & Hayman, 2006;Wakefield, Banham, & Martin, 2000;Wakefield, Chaloupka, & Kaufman, 2000). However, while considerable research has focused on the association between smoke-free policies and the health and well-being of nonsmokers, far less attention has been paid to their impact on those who continue to smoke (Burgess, Fu, & van Ryn, 2009).…”
Section: Evaluating the Health And Social Impact Of Smoke-free Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%