Limb bone diaphyseal structure is frequently used to infer hominin activity levels from skeletal remains, an approach based on the well-documented ability of bone to adjust to its loading environment during life. However, diaphyseal structure is also determined in part by genetic factors. This study investigates the possibility that genetic variation underlying diaphyseal structure is influenced by the activity levels of ancestral populations and might also have functional significance in an evolutionary context. We adopted an experimental evolution approach and tested for differences in femoral diaphyseal structure in one-week-old mice from a line that had been artificially selected (45 generations) for high voluntary wheel running and unselected controls. As adults, selected mice are significantly more active on wheels and in home cages, and have thicker diaphyses. Structural differences at one week can be assumed to primarily reflect the effects of selective breeding rather than direct mechanical stimuli, given that the onset of locomotion in mice is shortly after day seven. We hypothesized that if genetically determined diaphyseal structure reflects the activity patterns of members of a lineage, then selected animals will have relatively larger diaphyseal dimensions at one week compared to controls. The results provide strong support for this hypothesis and suggest that limb bone cross sections may not always only reflect the activity levels of particular fossil individuals, but also convey an evolutionary signal providing information about hominin activity in the past.Keywords cross-sectional geometry; genes; activity; artificial selection Anthropologists frequently use limb bone diaphyseal structure 1 to infer behavior, particularly activity levels, from skeletal remains. Individuals with thick diaphyses are (Larsen, 1997;Ruff, 2000). This paradigm is based on the well-documented ability of diaphyseal bone to adjust its structure during life to its mechanical environment (Goodship and Cunningham, 2001 and references therein). Generally, increased loading shifts the balance between bone's formative and resorptive activity towards net formation, while disuse causes net resorption. Although the mechanosensitivity of bone is undisputed, it is not the case that diaphyseal structure results solely from physiological adaptation to applied loads. Diaphyseal structure is also influenced by genetics (Eisman, 1999;Peacock et al., 2002;Middleton et al., 2008a), as well as nutrition, hormones, age, and other factors (for reviews in the anthropological literature, see Churchill, 1999;Chiu and Hamrick, 2002;Lovejoy et al., 2003;Pearson and Lieberman, 2004).The effect of genetics on modulating structure, independent of mechanical signals, is implied by analyses of juvenile human remains from geographically and temporally dispersed contexts which have shown that populational differences in gross diaphyseal dimensions emerge very early in ontogeny (e.g., Cowgill and Hager, 2007;Robbins, 2007;Cowgill, 2008). For exa...