2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.zool.2007.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relative importance of genetics and phenotypic plasticity in dictating bone morphology and mechanics in aged mice: Evidence from an artificial selection experiment

Abstract: Both genetic and environmental factors are known to influence the structure of bone, contributing to its mechanical behavior during, and adaptive response to, loading. We introduce a novel approach to simultaneously address the genetically mediated, exercise-related effects on bone morphometrics and strength, using mice that had been selectively bred for high levels of voluntary wheel running (16 generations). Female mice from high-running and control lines were either allowed (n = 12, 12; respectively) or den… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
3
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exactly how to control for type I error due to multiple comparisons is controversial in the literature, especially when several of the comparisons are presented only for completeness and several factors and covariates are primarily nuisance variables (e.g. Middleton et al, 2008). Therefore, for simplicity, we present two-tailed P values throughout.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exactly how to control for type I error due to multiple comparisons is controversial in the literature, especially when several of the comparisons are presented only for completeness and several factors and covariates are primarily nuisance variables (e.g. Middleton et al, 2008). Therefore, for simplicity, we present two-tailed P values throughout.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the mechanosensitivity of bone is undisputed, it is not the case that diaphyseal structure results solely from physiological adaptation to applied loads. Diaphyseal structure is also influenced by genetics (Eisman, 1999; Peacock et al, 2002; Middleton et al, 2008a), as well as nutrition, hormones, age, and other factors (for reviews in the anthropological literature, see Churchill, 1999; Chiu and Hamrick, 2002; Lovejoy et al, 2003; Pearson and Lieberman, 2004). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This site can be studied either in its entirety, 17,23 or in a subregion (for example 0.15 mm) centred at the narrowest point. 6,24 Cortical bone. If the procedures discussed in section 'Scan region' for midshaft scanning are followed for obtaining a consistent scan size for each animal and time point, the entire region can be analysed.…”
Section: B10mentioning
confidence: 99%