2006
DOI: 10.1080/02786820600612268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relative Influence of Atomization and Evaporation on Metered Dose Inhaler Drug Delivery Efficiency

Abstract: Factors influencing the delivery efficiency from HFA-134a MDIs were examined theoretically and experimentally. The time required for evaporation of HFA-134a and ethanol droplets were theoretically calculated. HFA-134a droplets were shown to evaporate approximately seven times faster than ethanol droplets of the same size, even though HFA-134a droplets cool to approximately 78 degrees below ambient temperature during evaporation. MDI delivery efficiency was experimentally shown to decrease with increasing ethan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(25)(26)(27) Unfortunately, DPIs and pMDIs use of low inhalation flow rates to reduce inertial impaction is typically compromised by the requirement of reasonably high flow rates needed to fluidize and disaggregate dry powders, (28,29) or by complex interaction between high-speed droplet clouds emitted from pMDIs with enveloping air flow. (19,30,31) Independent of the inhalation flow rate, patients are commonly instructed to perform a breath-hold for several seconds after inhaling, so as to allow aerosols additional time to settle under the influence of gravity in peripheral airways. (32) For nebulizers used to deliver aerosols during controlled tidal breathing, there exists greater opportunity to manipulate regional deposition patterns by varying the breathing pattern and employing the aerosol bolus technique.…”
Section: Parameters Affecting Addmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(25)(26)(27) Unfortunately, DPIs and pMDIs use of low inhalation flow rates to reduce inertial impaction is typically compromised by the requirement of reasonably high flow rates needed to fluidize and disaggregate dry powders, (28,29) or by complex interaction between high-speed droplet clouds emitted from pMDIs with enveloping air flow. (19,30,31) Independent of the inhalation flow rate, patients are commonly instructed to perform a breath-hold for several seconds after inhaling, so as to allow aerosols additional time to settle under the influence of gravity in peripheral airways. (32) For nebulizers used to deliver aerosols during controlled tidal breathing, there exists greater opportunity to manipulate regional deposition patterns by varying the breathing pattern and employing the aerosol bolus technique.…”
Section: Parameters Affecting Addmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6. The influence of valve size and nozzle orifice diameter on the fine particle fraction delivered using HFA 134a solution formulation of 0.167% (w/w) beclomethasone dipropionate and 8% (w/w) ethanol (38)(39)(40)56). The disposition of these droplets depends on a number of factors including the nature of the initial atomized spray (e.g., the initial droplet size, velocity, spray angle, and the overall plume momentum).…”
Section: The Influence Of Mouthpiece Configuration and Airflow Manipumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expansion chamber volume, which is comprised of the volume of the actuator sump and the internal valve stem bore, can influence the ratio of propellant in the liquid and vapor phases during the atomization process (38)(39)(40)(56)(57)(58)(59) and thus has the potential to influence drug delivery. However, in practice the influence of sump volume on delivery is minimal since the sump contributes only a small fraction of the overall expansion chamber volume (46).…”
Section: The Influence Of Sump Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the influence of cosolvents on vapor pressure and aerosol generation have been studied by a number of researchers (Vervaet and Byron 1999;Stein et al 2002;Stein and Myrdal 2004) including cosolvent evaporation on the final median aerodynamic diameter and the influence of drying time and temperature (Stein et al 2002;Haynes et al 2004;Stein and Myrdal 2004;Stein and Myrdal 2006). Here, we focus on the influence of nonvolatile components on the final "maturated" particle diameters collected on cascade impactor stages and compare empirically driven theoretical models with experimental measurements at both ambient and elevated temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%