2017
DOI: 10.4103/ortho.ijortho_405_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relative Merits of Cemented and Uncemented Prostheses in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Abstract: The results of modern cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasties are outstanding and both systems have their advantages and disadvantages. This paper aims to examine the designs of different types of prostheses, some history behind their development and the reported results. Particular emphasis is placed on cemented stem design and the details of cementing technique.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While regional differences remain significant, the use of cementless THA has been gradually increasing over the last couple of years [25], although the issues, such as bone cement implantation syndrome and potentially a higher mortality, that may have caused surgeons to move away from the use of cemented implants in the past have since been demonstrated to be unfounded. Overall, evidence to date does not clearly support the increasing use of cementless THA [26]. However, even when considering the age structure development, cementless fixation is clearly on the rise in Germany, as evidenced by the fact that during the last decade, the utilization of cemented THA in patients older than 75 years of age was cut in half in favor of cementless implants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While regional differences remain significant, the use of cementless THA has been gradually increasing over the last couple of years [25], although the issues, such as bone cement implantation syndrome and potentially a higher mortality, that may have caused surgeons to move away from the use of cemented implants in the past have since been demonstrated to be unfounded. Overall, evidence to date does not clearly support the increasing use of cementless THA [26]. However, even when considering the age structure development, cementless fixation is clearly on the rise in Germany, as evidenced by the fact that during the last decade, the utilization of cemented THA in patients older than 75 years of age was cut in half in favor of cementless implants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'nın, ciddi bir komplikasyon olan enfeksiyon riskinin azaltılması çalışmaları ve ilerleyen yıllarda enfekte olguların tedavisinde çimento içeriğine antibiyotik eklenmesi, yapısal modifikasyonların en net örneği olarak kabul edilebilir. [13] Enfeksiyon riskinin azaltılması için, çimentonun içerisinde antibiyotiklerden başka gümüş içeren nanopartiküller ve bakteri kaynaklı doğal antimikrobiyal yapıdaki bakteriosinler de kullanılmaktadır. [5] Çimentonun içerisine eklenen Vitamin E ise serbest radikalleri toplayarak çimento yapısının stabilize edilmesinde katkı yapan bir diğer maddedir.…”
Section: Modi̇fi̇kasyonlarunclassified
“…Cementless fixation requires a shorter time in the operating room, allows greater preservation of bone stock and provides easer revision;2 additionally, uncemented fixation is not affected by any of the possible complications associated with cemented fixation like third body wear and bone cement implantation syndrome 2,3. Despite these benefits, instability of uncemented joint replacements was a major drawback that prevented their diffusion 4. Modern designs have solved this problem and now these two fixation methods are used in a similar proportion of cases worldwide (although their relative popularity varies in different countries) and have similarly good clinical outcomes 4…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these benefits, instability of uncemented joint replacements was a major drawback that prevented their diffusion 4. Modern designs have solved this problem and now these two fixation methods are used in a similar proportion of cases worldwide (although their relative popularity varies in different countries) and have similarly good clinical outcomes 4…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%