2012
DOI: 10.1063/1.4767378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relaxation behaviour of supersaturated iron in single-crystal silicon at 500 to 750 °C

Abstract: Related Articles Correlated evolution of barrier capacitance charging, generation, and drift currents and of carrier lifetime in Si structures during 25 MeV neutrons irradiation Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 232104 (2012) The effects of vacuum ultraviolet radiation on low-k dielectric films J. Appl. Phys. 112, 111101 (2012) Comment on "Lifetime recovery in ultra-highly titanium-doped silicon for the implementation of an intermediate band material" [Appl.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7 presents a comparison of the extracted apparent diffusivities at 250-900 C with the literature values for the Fe diffusivities. 25,34 The fitted apparent diffusivities at 250-700 C are shown to agree in general with the Fe diffusivities reported in the literature, indicating that the gettering process is likely diffusion-limited in this temperature range. Moreover, Sun et al's analysis of the iron decay kinetics at 250-700 C gave an activation energy of 0.76 eV for the iron reduction process, 17 which is close to the iron diffusion activation energy of 0.67 6 0.02 eV reported in Istratov et al 25 and 0.73 6 0.05 eV in Murphy and Falster.…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Measured Iron Decay Kineticssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7 presents a comparison of the extracted apparent diffusivities at 250-900 C with the literature values for the Fe diffusivities. 25,34 The fitted apparent diffusivities at 250-700 C are shown to agree in general with the Fe diffusivities reported in the literature, indicating that the gettering process is likely diffusion-limited in this temperature range. Moreover, Sun et al's analysis of the iron decay kinetics at 250-700 C gave an activation energy of 0.76 eV for the iron reduction process, 17 which is close to the iron diffusion activation energy of 0.67 6 0.02 eV reported in Istratov et al 25 and 0.73 6 0.05 eV in Murphy and Falster.…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Measured Iron Decay Kineticssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This work extends the temperature range to 900 C. A model of iron diffusion to the gettering sites on both wafer surfaces, described in Ref. 34, is used to fit the measured iron decay kinetics at 250-900 C, with the apparent iron diffusivity being a fitting parameter. The kinetics data can be well described by the model, as shown by some examples in Fig.…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Measured Iron Decay Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in general our results do not show the systematic decay in bulk iron concentration with annealing time and temperature observed by Krain et al [12]. This is surprising because at the temperatures used the interstitial iron is massively supersaturated [18,19], which provides a driving force for precipitation. The reason for the discrepancy with Krain et al's work is not clearly understood, and this study aims to start to address this.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…At all temperatures studied, the measured interstitial iron concentrations are substantially in excess of the solubility values [18,19]. It is therefore surprising that the measured values increase upon annealing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Additionally, most of the solar cell processes that we simulate occur at higher temperatures where this solubility enhancement becomes negligible. The solubility and concentration gradient diffusion equations are solved by the algorithm suggested by Hieslmair et al [42], and the diffusivity of iron, Dp e , is described by Istratov et al [11,43]. Phosphorus diffusion is simulated as described in Bentzen et al [44].…”
Section: Systematic Variation Of Model Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%