2005
DOI: 10.1177/030630700503000305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relevance of emotional intelligence for leadership performance

Abstract: Leadership and Emotional Intelligence have become hot topics in organisations and management in recent years. This study explores the relationship between Emotional Intelligence, Leadership and Job Performance of Officers and Ratings within the Royal Navy. In particular, the focus is on the three elements of the new Leadership Dimensions Questionnaire (LDQ) – Intellectual (‘IQ’), Emotional (‘EQ’) and Managerial (‘MQ’) Competencies. These are related to performance measures derived from formal performance appra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
56
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…There is increasing evidence that EI predicts a wide range of additional positive outcomes. EI rather than intellectual capabilities has been found to be the differentiating factor in job performance (Goleman 1995;Goleman et al 2002, Dulewicz et al 2005, sales performance , supervisor ratings of overall job performance Slaski and Cartwright 2002), and team performance (Druskat and Wolff 2001;Jordan and Troth 2004). Furthermore, some writers have argued that EI can be usefully linked to job satisfaction (Sy et al 2006), organizational change (Huy 2002), workplace spirituality , global leadership (Alon and Higgins 2005), and effectiveness under high stress (Gohm 2003).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is increasing evidence that EI predicts a wide range of additional positive outcomes. EI rather than intellectual capabilities has been found to be the differentiating factor in job performance (Goleman 1995;Goleman et al 2002, Dulewicz et al 2005, sales performance , supervisor ratings of overall job performance Slaski and Cartwright 2002), and team performance (Druskat and Wolff 2001;Jordan and Troth 2004). Furthermore, some writers have argued that EI can be usefully linked to job satisfaction (Sy et al 2006), organizational change (Huy 2002), workplace spirituality , global leadership (Alon and Higgins 2005), and effectiveness under high stress (Gohm 2003).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigations of EI, organizational performance and/or leadership performance has become a central focus of research regarding these variables (Dulewicz et al 2005;Holt and Jones 2005;Rode et al 2007;Brooks and Nafukho 2006). Tischler et al (2002) were the first to conceptualize various aggregate models of EI, SI, and performance relationships and also identified many of the definitional and measurement issues.…”
Section: Limitations and Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rafaeli and Sutton, 1989;Staw et al, 1994) and that EI has a positive relationship with job performance (e.g. Dulewicz et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%