2015
DOI: 10.1017/s1755020315000313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relevant Fragment of First Order Logic

Abstract: Under a proper translation, the languages of propositional (and quantified relevant logic) with an absurdity constant are characterized as the fragments of first order logic preserved under (world-object) relevant directed bisimulations. Furthermore, the properties of pointed models axiomatizable by sets of propositional relevant formulas have a purely algebraic characterization. Finally, a form of the interpolation property holds for the relevant fragment of first order logic.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, by Proposition 2.5 of [2], the pair pΘ, Φq is satisfiable in V S , which is a contradiction since by definition Θ says that at least one of φ P Φ must hold. % When |PROP| ě ω, inconsistency is expressible by a single formula in the extension…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, by Proposition 2.5 of [2], the pair pΘ, Φq is satisfiable in V S , which is a contradiction since by definition Θ says that at least one of φ P Φ must hold. % When |PROP| ě ω, inconsistency is expressible by a single formula in the extension…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For all u and arbitrary e n such that u P B M4 1 and M 4 ( Ire n us, we have that M 4 ( Gruabs, and given that there is such a u, we have that aZ 1 b. But one of the formulas in Θ implies that there is also v P B M4 For clause (2) in Definition 4, suppose that i P t1, 2u and xZ i y, so there is e n (n P ω) in the sequence p˚q such that there is u P B M4 i , M 4 ( Ire n us and M 4 ( Gruxys. Now let R rU M 4 j s M 4 |K ybc for some b, c P U M4 j , i.e., R 4 ybc by Lemma 10.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations