The Report for Decision Making

Abstract

The report for decision making shares some common ground with the proposal, the report of scientific experiment, and even the persuasive essay, yet these genres differ. Recognizing these differences is necessary for effective inquiry, pedagogy, and decision making. The genres are means of solving different types of problems: practical, empirical, and theoretical. They serve different aims: action, demonstration, and conviction. The proposal, like the report, may solve practical problems, but the proposal advocates, whereas the report inquires. These genres all embody assumptions about problem solving and inquiry in their forms. Applying the problem-solving goals and methods of the proposal, experimental report, or essay to the report for decision making compromises the quality of the inquiry and of the resulting decision. Complex problems for decision making require a rhetorical method of inquiry based on Aristotle's special topics. The report genre reflects the invention heuristics and analysis in its form.

The Role of Technical Expertise in Engineering and Writing Teachers’ Evaluations of Students’ Writing

“…This genre is of interest because few wellestablished standards seem to exist for evaluating feasibility reports, as Rude (1995) found in her investigation of the genre (which she calls the "report for decision-making"):…”

The Effect of High-Impact Writing on Decision Making Within a Public Sector Bureaucracy

“…The experienced RAs expected information presentation to conform to these genre expectations. As Rude (1995) points out, genres trigger in readers assumptions about how a document should be used and the nature of knowledge within that document. Furthermore, genres steer readers' approach to interpretation and knowledge construction.…”

Environmental Reviews and Case Studies: Decision Making in the Environmental Impact Assessment Process

“…Earlier in this article, Rude (1995) was mentioned as suggesting that decision makers must consider three criteria (technical, managerial, and social) when making a decision. The Army appeared to concentrate on technical and managerial criteria when it emphasized its statutory mission, procedural requirements, training requirements, and costs.…”

“…For example, Rude (1995), who studied technical and business decision making, suggests that decision makers must consider three criteria (technical, managerial, and social) when making a decision. For example, Rude (1995), who studied technical and business decision making, suggests that decision makers must consider three criteria (technical, managerial, and social) when making a decision.…”