The reproducibility of measuring maximum abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter from ultrasound images

Abstract

Background Accurate repeat assessment of the diameter of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is important. This study investigated the reproducibility of different methods of measuring AAA diameter from ultrasound images. Methods Fifty AAA patients were assessed by ultrasound. Maximum AAA diameter was measured independently by three trained observers on two separate occasions using a standardised protocol. Five diameters were measured from each scan, three in the anterior–posterior (AP) and two in the transverse (TV) plane, including inner-to-inner (ITI), outer-to-outer (OTO) and leading edge-to-leading edge (LETLE). Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility were reported as reproducibility coefficients. Statistical comparison of methods was performed using linear mixed effects models. Results Intra-observer reproducibility coefficients (AP LETLE 2.2 mm; AP ITI 2.4 mm; AP OTO 2.6 mm) were smaller than inter-observer reproducibility coefficients (AP LETLE 4.6 mm: AP ITI 4.5; and AP OTO 4.8 mm). There was no statistically significant difference in intra-observer reproducibility of three types of measurements performed in the AP plane. Measurements obtained in the TV plane had statistically significant worse intra-observer reproducibility than those performed in the AP plane. Conclusions This study suggests that the comparison of maximum AAA diameter between repeat images is most reproducibly performed by a single trained observer measuring diameters in the AP plane.

Editor's Choice – Cohort Study Examining the Association Between Abdominal Aortic Size and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Aortic and Peripheral Occlusive and Aneurysmal Disease

“…20,21 Aortic diameter was measured from outer wall to outer wall of the artery in the orthogonal plane. 20,22 The reproducibility of aortic diameter measurements was assessed in each vascular laboratory, with interobserver reproducibility coefficients being < 4 mm as previously reported. 20e22 Body surface area was estimated according to the formula proposed by Mosteller.…”

3D-Ultrasound Based Mechanical and Geometrical Analysis of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms and Relationship to Growth

“…Another limitation is that only linear growth rates were investigated in this study. The limited accuracy of 2D US-based diameter measurements, which is generally estimated at 2 mm [ 49 , 50 ], prohibited the analysis of the pattern of the growth, while large differences in growth pattern between patients have been observed in previous studies with CT [ 51 ].…”

The correlation between different ultrasound planes and computed tomography measures of abdominal aortic aneurysms

“…Ultrasound is the first modality of choice to identify the presence of AAA and has been well‐reviewed and successfully applied in clinical practice. However, there remains some debate on the optimal placement of the callipers and the optimal plane from which to obtain the measurements 23 . As sonographers, can an improved AAA measurement using an alternative ultrasound plane be possible?…”

“…However, there remains some debate on the optimal placement of the callipers and the optimal plane from which to obtain the measurements. 23 As sonographers, can an improved AAA measurement using an alternative ultrasound plane be possible?…”