1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf00299853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The reproductive behavior of Anthidium manicatum (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) and the significance of size for territorial males

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
73
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
73
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We categorized small house flies as 'small flies', although in the Landcare Research protocol they were counted as a 'big fly'. Male A. manicatum were recorded as flower visitors when it was clear they were patrolling (see Severinghaus et al 1981) the area of plant that was being observed.…”
Section: Flower Visitor Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We categorized small house flies as 'small flies', although in the Landcare Research protocol they were counted as a 'big fly'. Male A. manicatum were recorded as flower visitors when it was clear they were patrolling (see Severinghaus et al 1981) the area of plant that was being observed.…”
Section: Flower Visitor Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although individual bees only maintain territories for 4Á7 days (Severinghaus et al 1981), as bees were not tagged it was not possible to know if we were observing the same male bee on different days. Therefore, we treated a bee observed on a different day as an independent observation.…”
Section: Pollen Loadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, within a species there is empirical support for the notion of large male mating advantage in male-territorial species (e.g. A. manicatum, Severinghaus et al, 1981;Starks and Reeve, 1999), but a lack of (e.g. Colletes cunicularius, Larsson and Tengö, 1989;O.…”
Section: Male-male Competitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these insects, large males often have a greater mating success than smaller males (e.g. Alcock et al, 1977;Emlen, 1997;Forsyth & Alcock, 1990;Serveringhaus et al, 1981). In contrast, variance in reproductive success is smaller among females than among males, and usually competition for mates is less intense in females (Davies, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%