The Responsibility to Responsibilize: Foreign Offices and the Issuing of Travel Warnings

Abstract

What are the connections between personal risk‐management and governmental responsibility toward citizens? This paper argues that governments in neoliberal societies increasingly acknowledge a responsibility to help citizens make “informed choices” in order to reduce or avoid risk. A key feature within this framework is the issuing of official governmental advice to the citizens. But such advice does not merely carry information that citizens are free to accept or decline. Rather, it also consists of a conscious effort on part of governments to construct individuals as calculating, prudent, and rational persons that know how to manage risk (to “responsibilize” them). Below I examine the practice of governmental advice as an effort of responsibilization in the case of travel warnings issued by foreign offices to international travelers.

The People's Home goes Gulliver: Sweden and the 2004 tsunami crisis

“…If one looks, one finds a number of examples that indicate that the Swedish state no longer looks at the mobility -or capabilities -of its residents in quite the same way. 11 Indeed, certain scholars working on questions of transborder travel, state power, and security have also identified governance at a distance, or the state's responsibility to responsibilise, as a major force shaping the provision of welfare by the state to the traveller today (Löwenheim, 2007;Zureik and Salter, 2005). The failure of the Swedish state to protect its touristing citizens overseas has now been directly addressed in a very recent piece of legislation, the 'Consular Catastrophe Law' (Konsulär katastroflag), which went into effect 1 August 2010 and attempts to delineate the relational terrain between the Swedish state and its travelling citizens/non-citizens in cases of catastrophe beyond Sweden's territorial boundaries.…”

Enacting the Millennium Development Goals: Political Technologies of Calculation and the Counter-calculation of Poverty in Namibia

“…Like other estimates and indicators for human rights (Rosga & Satterthwaite, 2009, p. 255), risk management (Löwenheim, 2007), and performance (Power, 2004), the UN's MDG initiatives advance the transnational spread of expert knowledge mobilized in the service of poverty reduction and pro-growth plans. As Ilcan and Phillips (2010) argue, calculative practices of the MDGs encompass information profiling, responsibilization, and knowledge networks as specific forms of neoliberal rationalities of government that shape new spaces and new social capacities.…”

Nationalism, Patriarchy, and Moralism: The Government-Led Food Reform in Contemporary Japan

“…Departing from the welfare state's commitment to social well-being, neoliberal governments construct social services as individual, familial, and community responsibilities (see, for instance, Garland 1996). According to Löwenheim (2007), there are at least three modes of responsibilization by the state. The first is privatization and state withdrawal from traditional welfare-state tasks.…”