2009
DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azp004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Responsibilization Strategy of Health and Safety: Neo-liberalism and the Reconfiguration of Individual Responsibility for Risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
121
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
121
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another crucial aspect of OHS management is responsibility sharing between employers and employees, and historically reconfiguration of responsibility characterises workplace safety. [19] Usually according to employment law, dealing with OHS issues is mainly the employers' responsibility (for instance according to the EU OHS Framework Directive). Also, as Hasle and Zwetsloot [18, p. 961] remind us the concept of OHS management systems have historically considered it an issue for management and not for workers, and only lately has the employees' role been shifted from information providers to stronger participation, but also increasing workers responsibility for their own safety at work.…”
Section: The Effect Of Safety Culture On Employee Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another crucial aspect of OHS management is responsibility sharing between employers and employees, and historically reconfiguration of responsibility characterises workplace safety. [19] Usually according to employment law, dealing with OHS issues is mainly the employers' responsibility (for instance according to the EU OHS Framework Directive). Also, as Hasle and Zwetsloot [18, p. 961] remind us the concept of OHS management systems have historically considered it an issue for management and not for workers, and only lately has the employees' role been shifted from information providers to stronger participation, but also increasing workers responsibility for their own safety at work.…”
Section: The Effect Of Safety Culture On Employee Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chikudate 2009;Collinson 1999;Gray 2009;MacEachen 2000;Packer 2003;Zoller 2003aZoller , 2003b) rarely adopt detailed discourse analytic approaches and therefore pay less attention to the negotiating powers of human communication, and (b) because the detailed discourse analytic studies that are available regarding meetings (Iedema 2003;Jarzabkowski and Seidl 2008;Wodak, Kwon, and Clarke 2011;Rasmussen 2011a) focus primarily on the chair's discursive moves. What the study shows is how meetings are used for the purpose of responsibilization, to make employees visible and accountable for risk management.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chikudate 2009;Collinson 1999;Gray 2009;MacEachen 2000;Packer 2003;Zoller 2003aZoller , 2003b, although without focusing on communication as a responsibility or examining discourse in a detailed way as done in the present study. This chapter will allow for a more detailed analysis of responsibilization through a focus on the local, "microscopic" discursive practices that Foucault (1978, 99f) ascribes constitutive capacity.…”
Section: The Governing Of Organizations and Risksmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In other words, in the quantitative conceptualisation of risk or its 'commodification', there is an active negation of humanity, ultimately in favour of a cost calculation of replacement 'human resources'. The costs of the 'burden' of regulation on free enterprise can be counterposed to those real risk burdens imposed upon workers who are themselves 'responsibilized' for safety failures' (Gray 2009). Yet today, ailing capitalism, having patently failed to 'self-regulate' through market forces, is supported by state and supranational interventions of unprecedented magnitudes.…”
Section: Charles Woolfson Linko¨ping University Swedenmentioning
confidence: 99%