2006
DOI: 10.1257/000282806777212503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Return to Capital in Ghana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
86
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
4
86
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our results are consistent with other estimates of returns to capital in Ghana: Udry and Anagol (2006) estimate a lower bound of 60% annualised returns to capital and report rates of up to 250 − 300% for farmers of certain crops. The comparative advantage of being self-employed for individuals with enough capital has increased over time in all our specifications.…”
Section: Iv-gmmsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, our results are consistent with other estimates of returns to capital in Ghana: Udry and Anagol (2006) estimate a lower bound of 60% annualised returns to capital and report rates of up to 250 − 300% for farmers of certain crops. The comparative advantage of being self-employed for individuals with enough capital has increased over time in all our specifications.…”
Section: Iv-gmmsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Recent interest in investing heavily in rural Africa, whether through distributing antimalarial bed nets (23,24), subsidizing fertilizer (25,26), or extending pineapple as an export crop (27), accentuates the importance of understanding the gendered nature of interactions of household members and attributing the gendered character of interaction to preferences, bargaining, or social norms. Future research should not neglect the burgeoning field of behavioral economics, which assesses the likelihood of significant differences across men and women in procrastination and time preference, attitudes to risk and aversion to loss (28), willingness to invest in competitive social situations (29), and preferences to structure social arrangements in ways that are perceived to be fair.…”
Section: Gendered Choice In Householdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, quite in line with Cunningham and Maloney (2001), a number of recent studies from diverse settings including Sri Lanka, Ghana, Kenya, West-Africa and Mexico have found very high returns to capital at low levels of capital in small-scale activities, thus contradicting the assumption of low subsistence returns at low levels of capital (McKenzie and Woodruff, 2006;Udry and Anagol, 2006;De Mel, et al, 2008;Kremer, et al, 2008;Fafchamps, et al, 2011;Grimm, et al, 2011). In addition, there is mixed evidence on the existence of high entry barriers (McKenzie and Woodruff, 2006;Udry and Anagol, 2006;Grimm, et al, 2011).…”
Section: The Dynamics Of the Informal Sector: Theoretical Aspects Andmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition, there is mixed evidence on the existence of high entry barriers (McKenzie and Woodruff, 2006;Udry and Anagol, 2006;Grimm, et al, 2011). 4 These empirical findings are at odds with the idea of poverty traps and more generally with the idea that the informal sector relates to a large extent to subsistence activities.…”
Section: The Dynamics Of the Informal Sector: Theoretical Aspects Andmentioning
confidence: 99%