2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2015.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The revised FLACC score: Reliability and validation for pain assessment in children with cerebral palsy

Abstract: Graphical Abstract.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The children were also screened for pain by use of validated measurement tools. For children between 2 months and 5 years or for children with developmental problems, the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale was applied . For children older than 5 years, the Numerical/Visual Analog Scale was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The children were also screened for pain by use of validated measurement tools. For children between 2 months and 5 years or for children with developmental problems, the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale was applied . For children older than 5 years, the Numerical/Visual Analog Scale was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For children between 2 months and 5 years or for children with developmental problems, the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale was applied. 20 For children older than 5 years, the Numerical/Visual Analog Scale was used. These ratings were performed after the PAED scale screening.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjective IVIG-AEs such as headache and abdominal pain were evaluated as much as possible by interviewing guardians if patients could not provide any information on subjective IVIG-AEs. Besides, the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) [21][22][23] or revised FLACC (r-FLACC) Scale [24,25] was used for those patients. The guardians rated patients' pain at its highest stage in each category on a scale of 0 to 2, yielding an overall pain score of 0-10 [21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Definition Of Adverse Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…found lower interrater agreement for the r‐FLACC categories of Legs and Activity in children with spasticity, but also found highest agreement for the Face and Cry categories and good overall interrater reliability. Others have also found excellent interrater reliability in younger children with CP (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.75) . Additionally, r‐FLACC scores have been found to be very responsive to procedural pain and treatment conditions (i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Additionally, r‐FLACC scores have been found to be very responsive to procedural pain and treatment conditions (i.e. scores increased on average by 2.23 points after surgery and decreased 4.2 points after analgesia). Together with data from other similar observational scales, such findings suggest that observed distress behaviors can provide an indication of pain severity and response to treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%