The Revival of Quantification: Reflections on Old New Histories

Abstract

Quantitative historical analysis in the United States surged in three distinct waves. The first quantitative wave occurred as part of the “New History” that blossomed in the early twentieth century and disappeared in the 1940s and 1950s with the rise of consensus history. The second wave thrived from the 1960s to the 1980s during the ascendance of the New Economic History, the New Political History, and the New Social History, and died out during the “cultural turn” of the late twentieth century. The third wave of historical quantification—which I call the revival of quantification—emerged in the second decade of the twenty-first century and is still underway. I describe characteristics of each wave and discuss the historiographical context of the ebb and flow of quantification in history.

The State of the Sub-discipline: Mapping Parliamentary and Legislative Studies Using a Survey and Bibliometric Analysis of Three of Its Journals

“…We suggest the task of parliamentary and legislative scholars, perhaps especially those in privileged positions, is both to cultivate an even playing field and to engineer a more interconnected, open sub-discipline in order for these insular and exclusionary tendencies to disappear. 16 Compare, for example, the tenor of the comments in our survey to those made by and about qualitative and quantitative historians over the years (Ruggles, 2021).…”

Challenges of Large-Scale Data Processing in the 1990s: The IPUMS Experience

“…The largest contingent of users, accounting for some 40% of the total, are economists, followed by sociologists, demographers, geographers, and public health researchers. The availability of historical and contemporary data in consistent format has contributed to a dramatic increase in qualitative historical research across multiple disciplines [25]. Google Scholar lists 26,700 books, articles, working papers, and dissertations citing IPUMS data, and a new paper appears approximately every 3 h. Beyond the academy, IPUMS has found substantial audiences in policy, planning, and news organizations.…”

Spiral of Violence: A Critical Analysis of The Genealogy of Islamophobia

“…The ignorant terms in the Qur'an appear four times (Qs [3:154,5:50,33:33,48:26) because of his strong desire to turn people away from pre-Islamic religious ideas, especially about idolatry. (Ruggles, 2021) Sayyid Qutb's view of the concept of jāhiliyyah is hazardous despite his approach that tends to do takfīr, which is an act of disbelief against individuals or groups considered not to follow the correct understanding of Islam. The concept of jāhiliyyah in Sayyid Qutb's view not only refers to the pre-Islamic period in Arabia but is also understood as a contemporary condition that still exists in modern society.…”