2002
DOI: 10.1002/app.11012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The rheological behavior of immiscible polymer blends

Abstract: The complex shear modulus of immiscible polymer blends was measured by a frequency sweep experiment for polystyrene (PS)/low density polyethylene (LDPE) and poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA)/LDPE blends at constant composition (13.5/86.5 vol %) and compared with the prediction model of Palierne. Different morphologies of each blend were also prepared using a rheometer with a constant shear rate and different strain. There was morphological dependency on the complex shear modulus at constant temperature. However,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Systematic variation of the inclusion diameter and the shear band thickness reveals a crossover in length scales that separates distinct plastic flow mechanisms in and around the nanocrystalline inclusion. When considered relative to the shear band thickness, small inclusions deform via heterogeneous, interface-dominated mechanisms, while large inclusions yield via the homogeneous nucleation of dislocations in the nanocrystal interior; nanocrystals roughly twice as large as the shear band width are required for the strongest interaction.The mechanisms and mechanics of deformation in amorphous materials have been the subject of extensive investigation by both experiment and simulation (see, for example, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]). The process of shear localization is of particular interest in this regard, as shear banding is often the dominant means of plastic strain accommodation in amorphous solids and, therefore, governs the macroscopic mechanical response.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Systematic variation of the inclusion diameter and the shear band thickness reveals a crossover in length scales that separates distinct plastic flow mechanisms in and around the nanocrystalline inclusion. When considered relative to the shear band thickness, small inclusions deform via heterogeneous, interface-dominated mechanisms, while large inclusions yield via the homogeneous nucleation of dislocations in the nanocrystal interior; nanocrystals roughly twice as large as the shear band width are required for the strongest interaction.The mechanisms and mechanics of deformation in amorphous materials have been the subject of extensive investigation by both experiment and simulation (see, for example, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]). The process of shear localization is of particular interest in this regard, as shear banding is often the dominant means of plastic strain accommodation in amorphous solids and, therefore, governs the macroscopic mechanical response.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms and mechanics of deformation in amorphous materials have been the subject of extensive investigation by both experiment and simulation (see, for example, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]). The process of shear localization is of particular interest in this regard, as shear banding is often the dominant means of plastic strain accommodation in amorphous solids and, therefore, governs the macroscopic mechanical response.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the case of polymer blends, the flow behavior becomes much more complex, and to a great extent, it is influenced by other factors such as miscibility, morphology, and interfacial adhesion of the system. Several attempts have been made so far to predict the complicated rheological behavior of polymer blends [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Utracki and Sammut [4] made a rheological evaluation of polystyrene/polyethylene (PS/PE) blends.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%