1984
DOI: 10.1016/s0163-6383(84)80176-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The rhythms & sounds of soothing: Maternal vestibular, tactile, & auditory stimulation and infant state

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intonation of ID speech has been shown to effectively engage infant interest (Kuhl, Coffey‐Corina, Padden & Dawson, 2005). Finally, mothers reliably use falling pitch contours in speech to infants when trying to soothe (Fernald, Kermanschachi & Lees, 1984) and rising pitch contours when trying to engage infant attention (in a social interaction) (Stern, Spieker & MacKain, 1982). These data have led to the idea that maternal prosody is finely tuned to infant attention and arousal level (Fernald, 1985) and can be used to modulate infant motivational states.…”
Section: Social Motivation In Human Language Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intonation of ID speech has been shown to effectively engage infant interest (Kuhl, Coffey‐Corina, Padden & Dawson, 2005). Finally, mothers reliably use falling pitch contours in speech to infants when trying to soothe (Fernald, Kermanschachi & Lees, 1984) and rising pitch contours when trying to engage infant attention (in a social interaction) (Stern, Spieker & MacKain, 1982). These data have led to the idea that maternal prosody is finely tuned to infant attention and arousal level (Fernald, 1985) and can be used to modulate infant motivational states.…”
Section: Social Motivation In Human Language Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When adults speak to infants, they typically produce utterances that have prosodic features that are dissimilar to those produced in conversations among adults (Snow & Ferguson, 1977). Many studies have examined the physical characteristics of this infant-directed (ID) speech and the cultural and interactional contexts in which various ID speech patterns are used by parents (Fernald, 1989; Fernald, Kermanschachi, & Lees, 1984; Fernald & Simon, 1984; Fernald et al, 1989; Papousek, Papousek, & Haekel, 1987; Papousek, Papousek, & Symmes, 1991; Stern, Spieker, & MacKain, 1982). To date, prosodic differences (including differences in mean fundamental frequency [F 0 ], frequency range, and duration) between ID and adult-directed (AD) speech have been empirically documented in French, German, Italian, Mandarin Chinese, and English (Fernald et al, 1989; Grieser & Kuhl, 1988), among other languages.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of parents’ ID speech have revealed that specific prosodic patterns are more likely to occur in certain interactional contexts than in others. Parents are more likely to use low-frequency vocalizations with falling frequency contours to soothe fussy infants, whereas they are more likely to use higher frequency, rising contours to elicit a response or attention from an infant or when interacting with infants expressing positive affect (Fernald et al, 1984; Papousek, Papousek, & Bornstein, 1985; Stern et al, 1982). These findings suggest that parents modify their ID speech as a function of the infant’s behaviors and affective state, creating opportunities for infants to learn that their behavioral or emotional responses elicit different vocal responses from caregivers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this intercommunicative context, as far as the sound 'quality' (pitch) is concerned, research has shown that adults use rising pitch contours (motherese) to engage and alert infants (Stern, Spieker, & MacKain, 1982) and falling pitch contours to soothe distress (Fernald, Kermanschachi, & Lees, 1984;Papousek & Papousek, 1984). It has been also found that infants prefer a happy voice quality to vocal modes of speech or singing, paying more attention to the presented stimulus, regardless of age (Corbeil, Trehub, & Peretz, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%