SummaryPacing from the right ventricular (RV) apex is associated with adverse effects such as heart failure and atrial fibrillation. We attempted pacing from the RV mid-septum, which is theoretically a more physiological pacing site. A total of 172 consecutive patients with indications for permanent pacemaker implantation were studied. A screw-in lead and a curved stylet were used for lead positioning on the RV mid-septum. Pacemaker indices were evaluated at implantation and one year later. As an electrocardiographic parameter, QRS duration was measured in lead II. These data were compared to those of 66 patients subjected to conventional RV apical pacing. Lead placement was successful in all patients of RV mid-septal pacing. There were no technical problems during or after the procedure. The cumulative percentage of ventricular pacing at one year postimplantation was 85 ± 24 % in the SSP group. Sensing, pacing threshold, and lead impedance in the SSP group remained clinically stable over one year. When these measurements were compared between the SSP and AP groups, the pacing threshold and the lead impedance at one year postimplantation in the SSP group were higher (P < 0.05) and lower (P < 0.01), respectively, than those of the AP group. The mean QRS duration was markedly shorter (123 ± 16 versus 150 ± 18 msec, P < 0.0001). Selective site pacing from the RV mid-septum is feasible and results in less conduction delay compared to conventional RV apical pacing, and its procedure seems to be more physiological in permanent pacemaker implantation. (Int Heart J 2012; 53: 113-116) Key words: Pacing procedure, Selective site pacing, Physiological pacing, Right ventricular mid-septal pacing, Pacemaker implantation T he mainstream of pacing treatment for bradyarrhythmia has been pacing from the right ventricular (RV) apex, which has been regarded as physiological pacing, to maintain atrioventricular synchrony. However, with conventional RV apex pacing, the impulse is conducted from the apex to the base of the heart and from the right to the left ventricles, and therefore the time for impulse conduction in the ventricles is significantly prolonged.1,2) This procedure is reported to cause ventricular dyssynchrony, 3,4) resulting in an increased risk for occurrence of heart failure 5-7) or atrial fibrillation. 7,8) Recently, selective site pacing (SSP), where alternate sites for ventricular pacing are used, has come into use to improve ventricular dyssynchrony.
9-11)In SSP, His-bundle or para-His pacing 12,13) and a procedure where a ventricular lead is positioned in the RV outflow tract have been used.14-16) The former involves technical difficulties, whereas the latter has produced unsatisfactory longterm effects and also poses a high risk of complications such as pericardial effusion.
17)In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of SSP in patients in whom RV leads were positioned in the middle of the RV septum (mid-septum) and compared it with conventional RV apex pacing. We also examined points to obtain f...