2017
DOI: 10.1111/josp.12180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Rights of Future Persons and the Ontology of Time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fracture strength dependence on ρ 0.5 (ρ = density) in the density‐dependent regime can be further understood as a relationship between fracture strength and elastic modulus ( σ f is proportional to E 0.5 ), where the elastic modulus is dependent on the density ( E is proportional to ρ). [ 64 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fracture strength dependence on ρ 0.5 (ρ = density) in the density‐dependent regime can be further understood as a relationship between fracture strength and elastic modulus ( σ f is proportional to E 0.5 ), where the elastic modulus is dependent on the density ( E is proportional to ρ). [ 64 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fracture strength dependence on ρ 0.5 (ρ ¼ density) in the density-dependent regime can be further understood as a relationship between fracture strength and elastic modulus (σ f is proportional to E 0.5 ), where the elastic modulus is dependent on the density (E is proportional to ρ). [64] To confirm the validity of the fracture dataset, a Weibull analysis was conducted. [65,66] For Weibull analysis, the ASTM C1161 standard recommends a minimum of 30 tests.…”
Section: Much Of the Variation In Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are strategies to overcome these exclusions. For instance, the as-yet unborn usually require elaborate metaphysical arguments such as eternalism (Griffith 2017) and a present-rights-of-future-persons view of human rights (Elliot 1989; Schlossberger 2008, 216–233), whereas there seem to be less sophisticated ways of considering children ‘affected’.…”
Section: Representing the Futurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third kind of reaction is to attack the sceptic arguments' underlying metaphysics of time and modality. Rather than thinking of duration as a three‐point linear order of past, present, and future, these reactions talk about identity in terms of an eternalist metaphysics of time in which all moments are actual (Griffith, ) or about the need for acknowledging alternative accounts of modality encompassing counterpart theory in which possible worlds are equally actual in their own way (Wrigley, ). The advantage of such reactions is that they prevent a future person from measuring violations of her rights against nonexistence—her rights exist in her world and can be compared with other existing rights in other temporal or possible worlds.…”
Section: Is There a Basis For Intergenerational Justice?mentioning
confidence: 99%