2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2007.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The rise and fall of deleterious mutation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, some other critical clues found in our study may, to some extent, explain the observation of high community rERs in extreme environments. As it was previously suggested that natural selection is less efficient in small populations30, our results supposed that relaxed purifying selection might occur more frequently in extreme environments because of the relatively smaller population sizes. Similarly, a more relaxed selective constraint was found in microbial communities in the deep sea rather than the surface water19.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Additionally, some other critical clues found in our study may, to some extent, explain the observation of high community rERs in extreme environments. As it was previously suggested that natural selection is less efficient in small populations30, our results supposed that relaxed purifying selection might occur more frequently in extreme environments because of the relatively smaller population sizes. Similarly, a more relaxed selective constraint was found in microbial communities in the deep sea rather than the surface water19.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…It has been found that among closely related strains or species dN/dS ratios can be elevated in a time-dependent fashion [31],[32], and thus not reflect longer term selection pressures. This is because such comparisons are akin to the study of de novo mutations that have not yet been eliminated at the population level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They include the effects of recent fixations and shared ancestral polymorphisms, but neglect the effect of lineage-specific polymorphisms. Their study was motivated by earlier studies on the effect of ancestral polymorphisms on estimates of mutation rate for closely related lineages, related to the apparent mutation rate acceleration (Ho and Larson 2006; Balbi and Feil 2007). A third study closely related to ours is the study by Kryazhimskiy and Plotkin (2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%