2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00148-012-0403-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The rise in absenteeism: disentangling the impacts of cohort, age and time

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that work ethics, when first established in the individual, are time‐invariant (Heinemann 2008, Hyggen 2008), and hence adjusted for by the fixed effects model, this additional finding does not support the normative erosion hypothesis. This is in line with previous register‐based research from Norway that did not find rises in sickness absence to be affected by the inclusion of new cohorts into the workforce (Biørn et al 2010), while it is in conflict with other research using more direct measures of norms (Lindbeck and Nyberg 2006, Heinemann 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Given that work ethics, when first established in the individual, are time‐invariant (Heinemann 2008, Hyggen 2008), and hence adjusted for by the fixed effects model, this additional finding does not support the normative erosion hypothesis. This is in line with previous register‐based research from Norway that did not find rises in sickness absence to be affected by the inclusion of new cohorts into the workforce (Biørn et al 2010), while it is in conflict with other research using more direct measures of norms (Lindbeck and Nyberg 2006, Heinemann 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The company had invested millions in new factories, production lines, and processes that improved ergonomics and safety in the workplace, thus reducing the risk of accidents, injuries, and sickness due to the work conditions. In addition, the average age of cooperative members went down in this period, from 45.5 years in 1999 to 43 years in 2006 (Fagor, 2006), something that theoretically should have contributed to lower absenteeism rates (e.g., Biørn, Gaure, Markussen, & Røed, 2013).…”
Section: Clashes Between Employee Ownership In Fagor and Absence Mamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many countries the absence rate for women is much higher than for men and the gap has been increasing over time (e.g., for the USA, see Paringer 1983; for Norway, see Mykletun et al 2010, Almlidutvalget 2010, Biørn et al 2010, Dale-Olsen and Markussen 2010for Sweden, see Angelov et al 2011). Alexanderson et al (1996) have investigated this empirical pattern and report a reduction in the gender gap by 50 percent when comparing males and females aged 16 to 44 exclusive of pregnant women.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%