2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-90058-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Rise, Spread, and Decline of Brazil’s Participatory Budgeting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
13

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
26
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The programs make it possible to generate citizen co-optation, in which the government's agenda supplants citizens' interests (Wampler, 2008b). In many places, PB has increasingly been used as a political tool rather than a democratic effort, which was its original purpose (Wampler & Goldfrank, 2022). In this context, the term "political tool" refers to a somewhat negative view, considering its use only as a "political brand" without the intention of its adoption being effective.…”
Section: Social Participation Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The programs make it possible to generate citizen co-optation, in which the government's agenda supplants citizens' interests (Wampler, 2008b). In many places, PB has increasingly been used as a political tool rather than a democratic effort, which was its original purpose (Wampler & Goldfrank, 2022). In this context, the term "political tool" refers to a somewhat negative view, considering its use only as a "political brand" without the intention of its adoption being effective.…”
Section: Social Participation Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the creation of the PB, Brazilian municipalities were, for many years, at the forefront of this participatory turn, whose mechanism was widely disseminated to other countries, with almost 12,000 programs in 71 nations (Dias, Enríquez, & Júlio, 2019). In contradiction, after a long period of growth, the best-known Brazilian democratic innovation almost disappeared from Brazil (Wampler & Goldfrank, 2022). PB's diffusion continues to occur worldwide which leaves an important question: why have so many Brazilian municipal governments stopped using PB?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mesmo com sua ampla e rápida difusão entre os países (Baiocchi & Ganuza, 2014), os resultados alcançados têm sido divergentes (Wampler, 2003(Wampler, , 2008, o que tem gerado descontinuidades, sobretudo no Brasil (de Renzio et al, 2019;Wampler & Goldfrank, 2022). Entre as dificuldades, a literatura discute (i) que o tempo para a participação é limitado (Uittenbroek et al, 2019); (ii) as expectativas dos participantes não são atendidas gerando frustração, levando-os a desistir da participação (Mcnulty, 2019;Paulin, 2019;Pires, 2011); (iii) seu uso como uma ferramenta política, ao invés de um esforço democrático, que era seu propósito original (Dias, 2018), levando ao afastamento de cidadãos não interessados em política partidária (de Renzio et al, 2019); (iv) baixo apoio do Poder Legislativo, que apresenta resistências ao perceber que o mecanismo participativo os marginalizava (Baiocchi & Ganuza, 2014); (v) complexidade da informação orçamentária, que possui jargões e conteúdos técnicos e complexos para cidadãos comuns, que em geral não estão dispostos a dedicar o tempo e o esforço necessários para aprender sobre o tema (Ebdon & Franklin, 2006;Wang & Niu, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified