2011
DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2011.02.0014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The road ahead for rehabilitation robotics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, after 20 years of investigation on robotic devices, including body weight support systems, efficacy is still uncertain, and most of the robotic use is still confined to research-controlled trial instead of in clinical practice 49. This skepticism has led to put into question the clinical usability of robots in neurorehabilitation: Hidler and Lum50 questioned the possibility that these devices will become commonplace in every hospital and rehabilitation clinic or whether they will become things of the past like so many other promising prototypes. In addition, Iosa et al,15 after having asked “Where are the robots promised by scientific literature able to restore motor functions after stroke?”, noted that despite surgical robots being introduced at around the same time as rehabilitation robots, only the benefit of the formers has been well established 38…”
Section: From “Efficacy For All” To “All For Efficacy”mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, after 20 years of investigation on robotic devices, including body weight support systems, efficacy is still uncertain, and most of the robotic use is still confined to research-controlled trial instead of in clinical practice 49. This skepticism has led to put into question the clinical usability of robots in neurorehabilitation: Hidler and Lum50 questioned the possibility that these devices will become commonplace in every hospital and rehabilitation clinic or whether they will become things of the past like so many other promising prototypes. In addition, Iosa et al,15 after having asked “Where are the robots promised by scientific literature able to restore motor functions after stroke?”, noted that despite surgical robots being introduced at around the same time as rehabilitation robots, only the benefit of the formers has been well established 38…”
Section: From “Efficacy For All” To “All For Efficacy”mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that this approach is also used by industrial robots. However, it must be considered that simple-to-use devices are more likely to be adopted by clinicians than those that have long setup times [135]. One way of enabling flexible and intuitive strategies to create new exercises could be robot programming by demonstration [136].…”
Section: Efficient Human-robot Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por el contrario, una desventaja fue identificar claramente la eficacia del sistema debido al número de pacientes que participaron del estudio. Suárez Mejías, et al 68 en 2013 diseñaron un robot para neurorehabilitación llamado: "URSUS", que se complementó con actividades de realidad aumentada. Este fue un robot social diseñado especialmente para rehabilitación de miembros superiores de niños con discapacidades motoras como hemiplejia.…”
Section: (Del Inglés: "New Jersey Institute Of Technology Robot-assisunclassified
“…Entender el futuro de la tecnología en mención no es tarea fácil, y para hacerlo se debe responder una serie de preguntas como aseguran Hidler, et al 68 , por ejemplo: ¿Cuál es la meta de un robot?, ¿Cuáles son las barreras de aceptación que una clínica y personal podrían establecer a dispositivos robóticos para rehabilitación?, ¿Cómo deberían ser los nuevos dispositivos, portátiles, o de uso doméstico?…”
Section: Proyecciones De La Rehabilitación Robóticaunclassified