2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2sc21221h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The robust electrochemical detection of a Parkinson's disease marker in whole blood sera

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9,11 In more recent work we have demonstrated that these capabilities can be incorporated into both the analysis of real patient samples and the simultaneous detection of multiple markers. 11,[17][18][19][20][21] Faradaic EIS assays are almost exclusively based on analysing the parameter of charge transfer resistance (R ct ) obtained by fitting the acquired current signal to a Randles equivalent circuit (see SI Figure 1 for details) , 22,23 while non-faradaic analyses most typically use modulus of the impedance (|Z|), double layer capacitance (C dl ) or phase (ϕ) as sampling functions. 9,[24][25][26][27] In both approaches a phenomenological model based either on an equivalent circuit 28 or continuum scheme derived from microscopic Poisson-Nernst-Plank continuum equations (using conventional or alternative approaches for diffusional activity) [29][30][31] can be applied from which physical parameters can be extracted.…”
Section: Introdutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,11 In more recent work we have demonstrated that these capabilities can be incorporated into both the analysis of real patient samples and the simultaneous detection of multiple markers. 11,[17][18][19][20][21] Faradaic EIS assays are almost exclusively based on analysing the parameter of charge transfer resistance (R ct ) obtained by fitting the acquired current signal to a Randles equivalent circuit (see SI Figure 1 for details) , 22,23 while non-faradaic analyses most typically use modulus of the impedance (|Z|), double layer capacitance (C dl ) or phase (ϕ) as sampling functions. 9,[24][25][26][27] In both approaches a phenomenological model based either on an equivalent circuit 28 or continuum scheme derived from microscopic Poisson-Nernst-Plank continuum equations (using conventional or alternative approaches for diffusional activity) [29][30][31] can be applied from which physical parameters can be extracted.…”
Section: Introdutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanotechnology has been used for both diagnosis and therapeutics of the PD in advance medical studies worldwide [14][15][16]. For PD diagnosis, several nanobiosensors have been developed so far based on the quantification of different biomarkers of PD such as dopamine [17,18], alpha-synuclein protein [19], homovanilic acid [20] and even PD-related genetic mutation [21]. Nanobiosensors comprise the advantages of using nanomaterials and nanostructures in biosensors, especially electrochemical nanobiosensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EIS is widely used to validate the layer-by-layer deposition of materials to a sensor surface because it is a very powerful tool for surface interface characterization and detection of changes to biosensor surfaces (Bryan et al, 2012;Rushworth et al, 2014). Here, impedance measurements were performed at each stage of the assembly in 10 mM K4Fe(CN)6/K3Fe(CN)6 (1:1 ratio) in PBS pH 7 over a frequency range 40-40,000 Hz.…”
Section: Confirmation Of Biosensor Assembly By Eis and CVmentioning
confidence: 99%