Magnetospheric Imaging — The Image Prime Mission 2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-0027-7_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role and Contributions of Energetic Neutral Atom (ENA) Imaging in Magnetospheric Substorm Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The images show that the ENA flux enhancement is weak-to-modest. More importantly, the enhancement is overall global and quasisimultaneous in MLT, and does not reveal any evidence for substorm-injected particles on the nightside; for substorm events, an ENA emission enhancement first occurs near midnight and then spreads toward the duskside all the way around to noon reflecting the ion drift effect, which is faster and clearer for higher energies than for lower energies [e.g., Pollock et al, 2003;Mitchell et al, 2001]. The lack of evidence for a substorm in the ENA response is consistent with the other observations discussed above.…”
Section: The 18 August 2001 Eventmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The images show that the ENA flux enhancement is weak-to-modest. More importantly, the enhancement is overall global and quasisimultaneous in MLT, and does not reveal any evidence for substorm-injected particles on the nightside; for substorm events, an ENA emission enhancement first occurs near midnight and then spreads toward the duskside all the way around to noon reflecting the ion drift effect, which is faster and clearer for higher energies than for lower energies [e.g., Pollock et al, 2003;Mitchell et al, 2001]. The lack of evidence for a substorm in the ENA response is consistent with the other observations discussed above.…”
Section: The 18 August 2001 Eventmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ENAs travel freely without being affected by electromagnetic fields in the magnetosphere, and they can be used to remotely measure the magnetospheric ions. This powerful tool for space plasma diagnostics has been used substantially for ring current study [e.g., Roelof, 1987;Henderson et al, 1997;Brandt et al, 2002a;Ohtani et al, 2006], for substorm or stormsubstorm relation research [e.g., Jorgensen et al, 2000;Reeves and Henderson, 2001;Brandt et al, 2002bBrandt et al, , 2002cReeves et al, 2004;Ohtani et al, 2005;Pollock et al, 2003], for oxygen studies [e.g., Lui et al, 2005;Mitchell et al, 2003;Nosé et al, 2005], and for other issues [e.g., Perez et al, 2004;Vallat et al, 2004]. Several spacecraft have made ENA observations, such as ISEE 1 [Roelof, 1987], Astrid [Barabash, 1995;Brandt et al, 1999], Geotail [Lui et al, 1996], POLAR [Henderson et al, 1997], Cassini [Mitchell et al, 1998] and IMAGE [Mitchell et al, 2000].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such data permit direct correlations to be made between globally integrated ENA images and the total energy of the ring current Jorgensen et al, 1997), while in addition, allowing the storm-time injection process to be visually tracked (Brandt et al, 2002b). Azimuthal asymmetry can be seen to evolve during a magnetic storm, reflecting the cumulative effects of ion drifts and the establishment and decay of the partial ring current (see, for example, Blake et al, 1995;Burch, 2003;Brandt et al, 2002a;Kozyra and Liemohn, 2003;Pollock et al, 2003). The drift of injected ions was first imaged by PO-LAR CEPAD/IPS, (Henderson et al, 2000).…”
Section: Low Altitude/high Altitude Ena Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remote ENA imaging of magnetospheric energetic ions was first demonstrated with IMP 7 & 8 and ISEE 1 observations of 50 keV ENAs [Roelof et al, 1985;Roelof, 1987]. Since then, ENAs have been used to remotely image the ring current during geomagnetic storms and substorms [e.g., Henderson et al, 1997;Pollock et al, 2003;Vallat et al, 2004], mostly from spacecraft at high altitudes, outside the trapped radiation belts. IMAGE extended the energies down to ∼1 keV [e.g., Mitchell et al, 2001;Pollock et al, 2001], and Astrid-1 made ∼26-37 keV ENA measurements in the polar cap and near the equator from low Earth orbit (LEO, ∼1000 km) [C: son Brandt et al, , 2002b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%