2016
DOI: 10.1108/jbim-12-2014-0250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role and impact of firm’s strategic orientations on launch performance: significance of relationship orientation

Abstract: Purpose This study examines the role and relative impact of market orientation, product orientation and relationship orientation on new product launch performance, investigating product advantage and market-based assets as alternative mediating mechanisms, which link these strategic orientations to launch performance. Design/methodology/approach Survey data from the pharmaceutical industry are used to test hypotheses in the research model using partial least squares modeling. Findings Findings show that wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For small firms, they found that the link was basing mainly due to strong correlation to competitor orientation, whereas for bigger companies, the link between performance and market orientation was generally weak. Links between market orientation (mainly competitor orientation in the case of Ledwith and O'Dwyer) and new product performance was also supported by other studies (Ledwith and O'Dwyer, 2009;Wong and Tong, 2011;Matikainen et al, 2016), competitor orientation's importance also later confirmed by recent research (Wong and Tong, 2011; O'Dwyer and Gilmore, 2019). Altogether, the results show that market orientation is a strong driver to launch success; There are hints that market orientation serves as a driver to administrational proficiency and thus facilitates the establishment of an efficient launch strategy.…”
Section: Market Orientation Marketing and Market Researchsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…For small firms, they found that the link was basing mainly due to strong correlation to competitor orientation, whereas for bigger companies, the link between performance and market orientation was generally weak. Links between market orientation (mainly competitor orientation in the case of Ledwith and O'Dwyer) and new product performance was also supported by other studies (Ledwith and O'Dwyer, 2009;Wong and Tong, 2011;Matikainen et al, 2016), competitor orientation's importance also later confirmed by recent research (Wong and Tong, 2011; O'Dwyer and Gilmore, 2019). Altogether, the results show that market orientation is a strong driver to launch success; There are hints that market orientation serves as a driver to administrational proficiency and thus facilitates the establishment of an efficient launch strategy.…”
Section: Market Orientation Marketing and Market Researchsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…However, as a considerable amount of time is required to analyze the huge volumes of customer data available, the knowledge gained may be out of date by the time it has been absorbed (Carbonell and Escudero, 2010; Li and Calantone, 1998; Zirger and Hartley, 1994). Consequently, to enable firms to perform better in turbulent environments, CRM-related capability improvement alone is insufficient (Matikainen et al , 2016; Song et al , 2013). Firms’ ability to transform customer knowledge into superior products or services offerings should also be enhanced (Ashrafi and Ravasan, 2018; Bendapudi and Leone, 2003; Lindh and Nordman, 2017; Preikschas et al , 2017; Zhang and Zhu, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some studies have shown new products developed through great leaps in technology and/or market advantages are more likely to generate significant benefits for the firms that develop them (Bonner, 2010; Jin et al , 2019). At the same time, Matikainen et al (2016) found that a heavy emphasis on CRM in NPD can be a limitation. McNally et al (2010) suggested that firms can hardly enjoy new product financial success through market newness focused.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars have also studied the mechanism by which CU influences NP and increasingly argue that CU contributes indirectly rather than directly through intangible assets (Matikainen et al , 2016) and capabilities (O’Cass and Heirati, 2015; Wang et al , 2016). Hence, CU is expected here to be a necessary but insufficient condition for NP, meaning that it is expected to be one of multiple conditions needed for NP.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%