2022
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.955965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of ACE1 I/D and ACE2 polymorphism in the outcome of Iranian COVID-19 patients: A case-control study

Abstract: Background: Since the beginning of the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), many countries have experienced a considerable number of COVID-19 cases and deaths. The etiology of a broad spectrum of symptoms is still debated. Host genetic variants might also significantly influence the outcome of the disease. This study aimed to evaluate the association of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE1) gene Insertion/Deletion (I/D) polymorphism (rs1799752) and ACE2 gene rs1978124 single nucleotide polymorphism … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent meta-analysis, including 11 studies with 950 patients with severe COVID-19, and 1573 patients with non-severe disease, reported that the DD genotype was related to COVID-19 severity through different models [22]. This finding agrees with our study and other reports in diverse populations [19,20,23] as well as another meta-analysis [24], which highlights the relevance of the RAS system, mainly the ACE gene, in the severity of COVID-19 and other pulmonary diseases. According to our findings, the DD genotype confers a risk of IMV requirement; meanwhile, the heterozygous genotype (ID) shows a decreased risk of requiring the procedure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…A recent meta-analysis, including 11 studies with 950 patients with severe COVID-19, and 1573 patients with non-severe disease, reported that the DD genotype was related to COVID-19 severity through different models [22]. This finding agrees with our study and other reports in diverse populations [19,20,23] as well as another meta-analysis [24], which highlights the relevance of the RAS system, mainly the ACE gene, in the severity of COVID-19 and other pulmonary diseases. According to our findings, the DD genotype confers a risk of IMV requirement; meanwhile, the heterozygous genotype (ID) shows a decreased risk of requiring the procedure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Although there was no signi cant association between genotypes and the outcome of disease, remarkably higher percentage of II genotype in dead cases (15%) than that in survived cases (4%), as well as noteworthy drop in the OS curve of patients carrying this genotype can be a clue for future studies with larger statistical sample size to verify the impact of II genotype on reducing survival and increasing death. These ndings are also consistent with another recent study on Iranian population in which the presence of I allele (II and ID) signi cantly increased the risk of intubation and the mortality rate in COVID-19 patients (Faridzadeh et al 2022). Moreover, they reported a signi cantly lower frequency of DD genotype in intubated patients, which can optimistically support our non-signi cant results based on approximately 8% reduction of DD genotype in dead cases (55%) compared to survived cases (around 63%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These contradictory findings warrant further large, and reproducible studies to decipher any possible genetic predisposition underlying susceptibility to SARS-COV-2 and disease progression and host immune response. In this regard, many studies assessed the impact of polymorphisms in the genes that encode crucial renin-angiotensin system components which are ACE or ACE2 on the susceptibility, severity, and clinical outcomes of the COVID-19 infection, exploring the hypothesis that individuals with ACE polymorphisms may have a more severe disease course in response to infection with SARS-CoV-2 [40][41][42][43][44]. Again, findings are controversial.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%