The Role of Actigraphy in the Study of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms

Abstract

In summary, although actigraphy is not as accurate as PSG for determining some sleep measurements, studies are in general agreement that actigraphy, with its ability to record continuously for long time periods, is more reliable than sleep logs which rely on the patients' recall of how many times they woke up or how long they slept during the night and is more reliable than observations which only capture short time periods. Actigraphy can provide information obtainable in no other practical way. It can also have a role in the medical care of patients with sleep disorders. However, it should not be held to the same expectations as polysomnography. Actigraphy is one-dimensional, whereas polysomnography comprises at least 3 distinct types of data (EEG, EOG, EMG), which jointly determine whether a person is asleep or awake. It is therefore doubtful whether actigraphic data will ever be informationally equivalent to the PSG, although progress on hardware and data processing software is continuously being made. Although the 1995 practice parameters paper determined that actigraphy was not appropriate for the diagnosis of sleep disorders, more recent studies suggest that for some disorders, actigraphy may be more practical than PSG. While actigraphy is still not appropriate for the diagnosis of sleep disordered breathing or of periodic limb movements in sleep, it is highly appropriate for examining the sleep variability (i.e., night-to-night variability) in patients with insomnia. Actigraphy is also appropriate for the assessment of and stability of treatment effects of anything from hypnotic drugs to light treatment to CPAP, particularly if assessments are done before and after the start of treatment. A recent independent review of the actigraphy literature by Sadeh and Acebo reached many of these same conclusions. Some of the research studies failed to find relationships between sleep measures and health-related symptoms. The interpretation of these data is also not clear-cut. Is it that the actigraph is not reliable enough to the access the relationship between sleep changes and quality of life measures, or, is it that, in fact, there is no relationship between sleep in that population and quality of life measures? Other studies of sleep disordered breathing, where actigraphy was not used and was not an outcome measure also failed to find any relationship with quality of life. Is it then the actigraph that is not reliable or that the associations just do not exist? The one area where actigraphy can be used for clinical diagnosis is in the evaluation of circadian rhythm disorders. Actigraphy has been shown to be very good for identifying rhythms. Results of actigraphic recordings correlate well with measurements of melatonin and of core body temperature rhythms. Activity records also show sleep disturbance when sleep is attempted at an unfavorable phase of the circadian cycle. Actigraphy therefore would be particularly good for aiding in the diagnosis of delayed or advanced sleep phase syndrome, non-24-hour-sleep syn...

Tryptophan-enriched cereal intake improves nocturnal sleep, melatonin, serotonin, and total antioxidant capacity levels and mood in elderly humans

“…For this reason, in the present work, it was decided to administer tryptophanenriched cereals at breakfast and dinner to elderly people who suffered from sleep onset and sleep consolidation problems. Actimetry is a noninvasive method in which trials were performed with a high sample with these kinds of assays and gives enough information to evaluate if a diet improves activity/inactivity circadian rhythm (Adamec et al 2010;Ancoli-Israel et al 2003). Wrist actimetry is a well-validated technique to study nocturnal sleep, as referenced elsewhere (Martin and Hakim 2011).…”

Sleep, Sleep Disorders, and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. What We Know and What We Need to Know: Findings from a National Working Group

“…These estimates can also be further manually edited based on sleep diary data to refine estimates of sleep and wakefulness patterns. Wrist actigraphy has been validated as a reliable proxy for sleep and circadian patterns in healthy adults and multiple sleep-disordered populations [51,52], and is frequently used as an outcome measure in sleep-related clinical trials. Importantly, wrist actigraphy can aid in the diagnosis of circadian rhythm disorders and evaluation of sleep in individuals unable to undergo PSG.…”

Fatigue, sleep, and circadian rhythms prior to chemotherapy for breast cancer

“…It contains a piezoelectric linear accelerometer (sensitive to 0.003 g and above), a log-linear photometric transducer (sensitive from <0.01 to >100,000 lx), a microprocessor, 32K RAM memory, and associated circuitry. The orientation and sensitivity of the accelerometer are optimized for highly effective sleep-wake inference from wrist activity, which has been previously validated [1,2,17]. Action 3 (Ambulatory Monitoring Inc.) was used to analyze the actigraphy data.…”

“…Two objective methodologies have been used: wrist actigraphy, which measures sleep/wake activity patterns and circadian rhythms over multiple days [2]; and polysomnography, which is the gold standard for measuring sleep stages and sleep disturbances for one night. Studies using actigraphy have shown that in patients with cancer, sleep was fragmented, sleep efficiency (the amount of sleep given the amount of time in bed) was low, patients were more restless at night during treatment, and circadian activity rhythms showed little variation between night and day (i.e., were not robust and were desynchronized), with equal amounts of activity during the day and night instead of high activity during the day and low activity at night [6,32,33].…”