1999
DOI: 10.1080/13510349908403616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of actors and institutions: The difficulties of democratic survival in Mali and Niger

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only four days after the ousting of president Traoré on March 30, 1991, the democratic opposition movement and those military leaders who had overthrown the president created a transitional government, the Comité de Transition pour la Salut du Peuple (CTSP), which organized the transition and stepped down after the first democratic elections had taken place in April 1992 (see Hanke 2001, 115). The core of the transition phase was the National Conference, which reflected all relevant political and social discussions in a condensed form (Moestrup 1999; Nzouankeu 1993).…”
Section: Democratic Transition (1991–1992): Institutional Path Dependmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only four days after the ousting of president Traoré on March 30, 1991, the democratic opposition movement and those military leaders who had overthrown the president created a transitional government, the Comité de Transition pour la Salut du Peuple (CTSP), which organized the transition and stepped down after the first democratic elections had taken place in April 1992 (see Hanke 2001, 115). The core of the transition phase was the National Conference, which reflected all relevant political and social discussions in a condensed form (Moestrup 1999; Nzouankeu 1993).…”
Section: Democratic Transition (1991–1992): Institutional Path Dependmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also while certain studies have incorporated semipresidential countries in more general studies of turnout (Dettrey & Schwindt-Bayer, 2009;Pacek et al, 2009;Tavits, 2009), to our knowledge there is no study that applies the logic of first and second-order elections to the context of legislative elections under semi-presidentialism. Equally, while there is now a growing literature on semipresidentialism, this work has tended to focus on the effect of this regime type on democratic stability (Elgie and Schleiter 2011;Elgie, 2011;Moestrup, 1999;Skach, 2005) and on relations between the president, the prime minister and the legislature (Protsyk, 2006;Schleiter & Morgan-Jones, 2010;Sedelius & Ekman, 2010). In this article, we focus on the differential effect on turnout of presidential power under semipresidentialism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%