2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of aluminium and iron in phosphorus removal by treatment peatlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar DPS value for the surface layer of Fluv-16yr (117%) compared to that of the other Fluv CWs (92-123%) was found, although much more P accumulated in the Fluv-16yr surface layer ( Figure 1a, and wetlands is well documented (e.g., Reddy et al, 1995;Richardson, 1985). Our results indicate, that even though Al and Addition of cationic metals such as Fe 3+ , Al 3+ and Ca 2+ is known to enhance the efficiency of P immobilization (Karjalainen et al, 2016;Laakso et al, 2016;Ronkanen et al, 2016 (Ann et al, 2000).. Using column leaching experiments, Fe and Al containing inflow water was shown to increase P removal (up to 7 fold) and extend retention capacity (10-100 times) of peatland soils as compared to metal free water (Ronkanen et al, 2016).…”
Section: Sorption Mechanisms and Degree Of Phosphorus Saturation Ofmentioning
confidence: 46%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A similar DPS value for the surface layer of Fluv-16yr (117%) compared to that of the other Fluv CWs (92-123%) was found, although much more P accumulated in the Fluv-16yr surface layer ( Figure 1a, and wetlands is well documented (e.g., Reddy et al, 1995;Richardson, 1985). Our results indicate, that even though Al and Addition of cationic metals such as Fe 3+ , Al 3+ and Ca 2+ is known to enhance the efficiency of P immobilization (Karjalainen et al, 2016;Laakso et al, 2016;Ronkanen et al, 2016 (Ann et al, 2000).. Using column leaching experiments, Fe and Al containing inflow water was shown to increase P removal (up to 7 fold) and extend retention capacity (10-100 times) of peatland soils as compared to metal free water (Ronkanen et al, 2016).…”
Section: Sorption Mechanisms and Degree Of Phosphorus Saturation Ofmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Our results indicate, that even though Al and Addition of cationic metals such as Fe 3+ , Al 3+ and Ca 2+ is known to enhance the efficiency of P immobilization (Karjalainen et al, 2016;Laakso et al, 2016;Ronkanen et al, 2016 (Ann et al, 2000).. Using column leaching experiments, Fe and Al containing inflow water was shown to increase P removal (up to 7 fold) and extend retention capacity (10-100 times) of peatland soils as compared to metal free water (Ronkanen et al, 2016). In addition, the authors reported a strong and significant correlation between removal of P and removal of Fe and Al at this site.…”
Section: Sorption Mechanisms and Degree Of Phosphorus Saturation Ofmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PO4-P is retained in peat-based treatment wetlands mainly by chemical adsorption in the surface peat layers, and the P sorption capacity of these layers increases with increasing Fe and Al content of the peat (Heikkinen et al, 1995b;Ronkanen et al, 2016). Similarly, colloidal retention processes typical of naturally coloured waters (Heikkinen, 1990;Jones et al, 1993) exist in peat extraction site runoff water (Heikkinen and Ihme, 1995), where P is also to be found as dissolved organic P carried by HAMW organic-Fe colloids, which is therefore retained along with colloid retention (Heikkinen and Ihme, 1995;.…”
Section: Needs and Possibilities For Increasing P Retentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the increase of soil labile P is closely connected with the variation of pH, lime application rates and soil properties, etc., 15‐17 the primary function of using lime to enhance P availability is through stimulating the mineralization of organic P, 16 breaking the structure of Al/Fe phosphate or decreasing the binding energy of Al/Fe (hydr)oxides 18,19 . The most common liming material for arable red soils is limestone with an application rate of 3 to 6 Mg ha −1 reported 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%