2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of boost and hypofractionation as adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with DCIS: A meta-analysis of observational studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
37
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…(58) A meta-analysis of observational series including 2,534 patients from 4 retrospective studies found no significant difference in the LR rate between conventional and HF-RT for DCIS; however, a trend for lower recurrence with HF was observed (odds rate 0.78, p=0.88). (59) There is no inherent reason that normal tissue side effects should be different following WBRT for patients with excised DCIS as compared to excised invasive cancer. Therefore, a short RT schedule of 40 Gy in 15 daily fractions on 42.5 Gy in 16 daily fractions should be offered as an option to patients with DCIS.…”
Section: Particular Aspects Of Rt In Dcismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(58) A meta-analysis of observational series including 2,534 patients from 4 retrospective studies found no significant difference in the LR rate between conventional and HF-RT for DCIS; however, a trend for lower recurrence with HF was observed (odds rate 0.78, p=0.88). (59) There is no inherent reason that normal tissue side effects should be different following WBRT for patients with excised DCIS as compared to excised invasive cancer. Therefore, a short RT schedule of 40 Gy in 15 daily fractions on 42.5 Gy in 16 daily fractions should be offered as an option to patients with DCIS.…”
Section: Particular Aspects Of Rt In Dcismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if only patients with positive margins were included, there was a significant benefit (odds ratio 0.56, p=0.01). (59) Data from 4,131 cases of DCIS treated in ten academic institutions from the United States, Canada and France were recently reported. (64) Eligible patients included those with pure DCIS (i.e.…”
Section: Role Of a Tumor Bed Boost In Dcismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nilsson et al [29] summarized the available studies in a recently published meta-analysis of 12 retrospective studies with a total of 6,943 patients. The overall quality of the included studies was rated as very low.…”
Section: Application Of a Tumor Bed Boost In Dcismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent meta-analysis of Nilsson et al [29] included 2,534 patients from 4 retrospective studies, and concluded that there was no significant difference between conventional and hypofractionated RT for DCIS; however, a trend for lower recurrence with hypofractionation was observed (odds rate 0.78, p = 0.08). The quality of evidence from the included trials was rated as low.…”
Section: Hypofractionationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Avec un taux de récidive locale de 3 % à 5 ans, nos résultats sont comparables à ceux des essais randomisés qui ont utilisé une radiothérapie classique [4,[24][25][26]. Une récente méta-analyse qui regroupait quatre études comparant des radiothérapies classiques et hypofractionnées a conclu qu'il n'y avait aucune différence en termes de récidives locales (odds ratio [OR] : 0,78 ; intervalle de confiance à 95 % [IC95 %] : 0,58-1,03 ; p = 0,08) [27]. L'analyse des données actuelles semble indiquer qu'une radiothérapie mammaire hypofractionnée serait aussi sécuritaire que le régime standard en termes de récidives locales, mais le niveau de preuve est assez faible.…”
Section: Autres Indications De La Radiothérapie Mammaire Hypofractionnéeunclassified